[CCWG-ACCT] Timeline?

[Greg Shatan]

Malcolm,

I don't believe that feedback from the GNSO regarding the Third Draft
Proposal has been received yet (although feedback from various stakeholder
groups and constituencies has been received as part of the public comment
process).

That said, I don't think that should hold up revision of the timeline.

Greg

On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 4:00 AM, Malcolm Hutty <malcolm at linx.net> wrote:

> Did we not receive feedback from all Chartering organisations to the Third
> Public Comment? Did I miss some that you are expecting?
>
> Or by "feedback" do you mean final endorsement of our paper? I do not
> think you will get that before we indicate that we have stopped making
> changes to it.
>
> Sent from my iDevice; please excuse terseness and typos.
>
> On 11 Jan 2016, at 21:14, Thomas Rickert <rickert at anwaelte.de> wrote:
>
> Greg, all,
> we will only be able to offer a firm new timeline once feedback from all
> chartering orgs is received and once we had discussions on all
> recommendations with our group.
>
> Best,
> Thomas
>
> ---
> rickert.net
>
>
> Am 11.01.2016 um 21:09 schrieb Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>:
>
> Dear Co-Chairs,
>
> The most recent CCWG timeline I'm aware of is the one attached here.  As
> far as I can tell, we are no longer on this schedule.  What is our new
> timeline?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Greg
>
> <CCWG Timeline.pdf>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160112/29c002ca/attachment.html>