[CCWG-ACCT] improve working methods for drafting of reports issued in name of CCWG - ACCT

Nigel Roberts nigel at channelisles.net
Tue Jan 12 18:20:13 UTC 2016


I am probably being very dull after the end of a long day of doing 
figurework, but I really don't quite follow your meaning here.

What exactly is the critical necessity to which you refer?

Having a vague secretive black box, or making sure we don't have one?? I 
think it's a bit late for the latter.


(Unless Darth Vader is going to take off his helmet, the Empire's will 
shall prevail?)

On 12/01/16 18:04, Avri Doria wrote:
> This has been discussed several times before.
> Due to the impression that nothing has changed after previous
> conversations and we are coming so close to the bitter end, it becomes a
> critical necessity.
> avri
> On 12-Jan-16 12:57, Nigel Roberts wrote:
>>> .. . .. ..   I am simply not
>>> comfortable with this vague secretive "black box" process that removes
>>> decisional authority from the Members.
>> I am genuinely wondering how this has taken so long for other people
>> to realise this.

More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list