[CCWG-ACCT] DOCUMENT - Rec 11 - GAC Advice (first reading)

[Greg Shatan]

Mike,

Good point and good catch.  This should not have been overlooked.

Greg

On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 9:52 PM, Chartier, Mike S <mike.s.chartier at intel.com
> wrote:

> I think this is another illustration of how we need to be careful in
> documenting the process for handling comments (other than the Boards). For
> Recommendation 11 several commenters offered the proposal to add a
> requirement for GAC advice to be accompanied by a rationale. Given the
> general acceptance of proposals for rationales in other areas, I would have
> thought it would have at least been given a note in the prep document.
>
> Look forward to discussing on Tues.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org [mailto:
> accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Alice
> Jansen
> *Sent:* Friday, January 15, 2016 12:01 PM
> *To:* accountability-cross-community at icann.org
> *Subject:* [CCWG-ACCT] DOCUMENT - Rec 11 - GAC Advice (first reading)
>
>
>
> *Sent on behalf of CCWG-ACCT Co-Chairs*
>
>
>
> In preparation for your R*ecommendation 11 – GAC Advice (first reading)* discussion
> scheduled for your call #78 - Tuesday, 19 January 2016 (12:00 – 15:00
> UTC) - please find attached the material to review.
>
> Please use this email thread to circulate any comments you may have in
> advance of the call.
>
>
>
> Thank you
>
>
>
> Mathieu, Thomas, León
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160117/85819dca/attachment.html>