[CCWG-ACCT] DOCUMENT - Rec 11 - GAC Advice (first reading)

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Msthiru
You   See that people opening 
A new topic????
Kavouss
Sent from my iPhone

> On 18 Jan 2016, at 09:22, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> The most basic example could go in the form "... We recommend xyz on the abc reason/basis"
> 
> Regards
> 
>> On 18 Jan 2016 9:16 a.m., "Kavouss Arasteh" <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Dear All,
>> Thank you for your message and reminders,
>> May I ask you to kindly give atleast few example of any of those " Rationale"
>> Tks
>> Kavouss
>> 
>> 2016-01-18 9:10 GMT+01:00 Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill at afnic.fr>:
>>> Mike,
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Good catch indeed. Precisely the point of our first reading exercise.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> So we will add this to recommendation 11 agenda item tomorrow.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> I will note that the current annex includes a related recommendation :
>>> 
>>> ·         Insert a mention for all ACs: “The AC will make every effort to ensure that the advice provided is clear and supported by a rationale.”
>>> 
>>> Best,
>>> 
>>> Mathieu
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> De : accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] De la part de Greg Shatan
>>> Envoyé : lundi 18 janvier 2016 05:30
>>> À : Chartier, Mike S
>>> Cc : accountability-cross-community at icann.org
>>> Objet : Re: [CCWG-ACCT] DOCUMENT - Rec 11 - GAC Advice (first reading)
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Mike,
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Good point and good catch.  This should not have been overlooked.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Greg
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 9:52 PM, Chartier, Mike S <mike.s.chartier at intel.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I think this is another illustration of how we need to be careful in documenting the process for handling comments (other than the Boards). For Recommendation 11 several commenters offered the proposal to add a requirement for GAC advice to be accompanied by a rationale. Given the general acceptance of proposals for rationales in other areas, I would have thought it would have at least been given a note in the prep document.
>>> 
>>> Look forward to discussing on Tues.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> From: accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Alice Jansen
>>> Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 12:01 PM
>>> To: accountability-cross-community at icann.org
>>> Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] DOCUMENT - Rec 11 - GAC Advice (first reading)
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Sent on behalf of CCWG-ACCT Co-Chairs
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> In preparation for your Recommendation 11 – GAC Advice (first reading) discussion scheduled for your call #78 - Tuesday, 19 January 2016 (12:00 – 15:00 UTC) - please find attached the material to review. 
>>> 
>>> Please use this email thread to circulate any comments you may have in advance of the call.
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Thank you
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Mathieu, Thomas, León
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160118/433d401d/attachment-0001.html>