[CCWG-ACCT] Blog Post by ISOC's Kathy Brown

Greg Shatan gregshatanipc at gmail.com
Thu Jan 21 05:31:42 UTC 2016


My guess is that was based on our (now-outdated but not yet replaced)
timeline, and without taking notice of the situation as it has unfolded
since that timeline was circulated.


On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>

> On 20 Jan 2016 17:34, "Konstantinos Komaitis" <komaitis at isoc.org> wrote:
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > Later this week, ICANN’s Chartering Organizations will indicate whether
> they will support the third draft proposal of the CCWG-Accountability Work
> Stream 1 Recommendations.
> >
> SO: I don't know what gives this impression but while its good to be
> optimistic, I am not sure the statement above is close to being
> realistically possible. I wish it was, but as this process progress it
> somehow feels we are getting further away from ending WS1 :(
> Regards
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160121/1ddae3e1/attachment.html>

More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list