[CCWG-ACCT] ICANN Board comments - Recommendation 3 - Fundamental Bylaws
kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
Tue Jan 26 07:58:17 UTC 2016
Welcome back to the scene.
Now there are three different interpretations of Designator
1. From Bruce
2. From Grec and few others
3 .From Jordan
See the corresponding messages from these three distinguished colleagues
In my view the third one is more close to the reality ( the manner in which
community powers are described in all three CCWG proposals
However, we need to have the views of the Lawyers and consensus agreement
2016-01-26 7:54 GMT+01:00 Dr Eberhard W Lisse <el at lisse.na>:
> One wonders why one doesn't call it Sole Designator.
> On 2016-01-26 06:42, Greg Shatan wrote:
> > Recommendation 1 states:
> > . The entity created using the Sole Designator model will be
> > referred to as the “Empowered Community.” (Summary, Page 1,
> > bullet point 3).
> > In other words the Sole Designator is the Empowered Community, and
> > vice versa. You are introducing a dichotomy where none exists.
> > Greg
> Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar)
> el at lisse.NA / * | Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
> PO Box 8421 \ /
> Bachbrecht, Namibia ;____/
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community