[CCWG-ACCT] Fwd: GAC views on draft recommendations of the third draft proposal of the CCWG-accountability

Kavouss Arasteh kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
Tue Jan 26 15:23:17 UTC 2016


Dear Paul,
GAC has sent its comments abut all 12 Recs
Regards
Kavouss

2016-01-26 16:15 GMT+01:00 Phil Corwin <psc at vlaw-dc.com>:

> When Leon’s email arrived last night the first thing I did after opening
> the attachment was scroll to Recommendation 11, because that is the one
> that most directly speaks to the GAC’s post-transition influence upon ICANN
> policy decisions, and also the one that has engendered the most controversy
> (finding almost no support, e.g., among members of the GNSO).
>
>
>
> So I was of course astounded to see “There is no consensus within the GAC
> to adopt a formal position on this Recommendation”. That’s it, without even
> any further exposition on the divergent views within the GAC to provide a
> minimum of guidance.
>
>
>
> This is of course a reminder of how difficult it is for the GAC to render
> advice under the current operating procedure of consensus (and why in the
> future the GAC might be tempted to lower or redefine that standard to
> bolster its input). It is also a sharp reminder that governmental
> representatives engaging in the CCWG’s process are expressing only the view
> of their nation and not any overall GAC position.
>
>
>
> As for how the CCWG should proceed given that the GAC has no position on
> rec. 11, well given that it has missed its chance to register either
> support, objection, or recommendations for modification I think CCWG has no
> choice but to proceed based upon input from other Chartering Organizations,
> because waiting on the GAC is not feasible under the current timeline
> however it is measured.
>
>
>
> *Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal*
>
> *Virtualaw LLC*
>
> *1155 F Street, NW*
>
> *Suite 1050*
>
> *Washington, DC 20004*
>
> *202-559-8597 <202-559-8597>/Direct*
>
> *202-559-8750 <202-559-8750>/Fax*
>
> *202-255-6172 <202-255-6172>/cell*
>
>
>
> *Twitter: @VlawDC*
>
>
>
> *"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey*
>
>
>
> *From:* accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org [mailto:
> accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Paul
> Rosenzweig
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 26, 2016 9:33 AM
> *To:* 'León Felipe Sánchez Ambía'; 'Accountability Cross Community'
> *Cc:* 'ACCT-Staff'
> *Subject:* Re: [CCWG-ACCT] Fwd: GAC views on draft recommendations of the
> third draft proposal of the CCWG-accountability
>
>
>
> I know that the Annex 11 is on for discussion today.  Is it just me or
> does it seem to others near impossible to reach a conclusion on Annex 11
> without the GAC’s input?  Even if, in the end, we wind up not accepting
> their position I would have thought it essential to do so knowing what that
> position is.
>
>
>
> Or is it the case that we are going to drive ahead and just proceed
> without the GAC because they can’t meet our timeline of consideration?
>
>
>
> Paul
>
>
>
> Paul Rosenzweig
>
> paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com
> <paul.rosenzweigesq at redbranchconsulting.com>
>
> O: +1 (202) 547-0660
>
> M: +1 (202) 329-9650
>
> VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739
>
> Skype: paul.rosenzweig1066
>
> Link to my PGP Key
> <http://www.redbranchconsulting.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=19&Itemid=9>
>
>
> <http://www.rsaconference.com/events/us16?utm_source=signature&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=speakers-us2016>
>
>
>
> *From:* León Felipe Sánchez Ambía [mailto:leonfelipe at sanchez.mx
> <leonfelipe at sanchez.mx>]
> *Sent:* Monday, January 25, 2016 8:15 PM
> *To:* Accountability Cross Community <
> accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
> *Cc:* ACCT-Staff <acct-staff at icann.org>
> *Subject:* [CCWG-ACCT] Fwd: GAC views on draft recommendations of the
> third draft proposal of the CCWG-accountability
>
>
>
> Dear all,
>
>
>
> I am forwarding the GAC’s views on the draft recommendations of our third
> draft proposal.
>
>
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
>
>
> León
>
>
>
> Inicio del mensaje reenviado:
>
>
>
> *De: *<Thomas.Schneider at bakom.admin.ch>
>
> *Asunto: GAC views on draft recommendations of the third draft proposal of
> the CCWG-accountability*
>
> *Fecha: *25 de enero de 2016, 6:50:14 p.m. GMT-6
>
> *Para: *<thomas at rickert.net>, <mathieu.weill at afnic.fr>, <
> leonfelipe at sanchez.mx>
>
> *Cc: *<gac at icann.org>
>
>
>
> Dear Co-Chairs
>
>
>
> Please find attached the GAC’s views on the draft recommendations of the
> third draft proposal of the CCWG Accountability.
>
>
>
> Best regards
>
>
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thomas Schneider
>
> Chair
>
> ICANN Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC)
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2016.0.7227 / Virus Database: 4489/11316 - Release Date: 01/03/16
> Internal Virus Database is out of date.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160126/b634741c/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 2849 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160126/b634741c/image001-0001.png>


More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list