[CCWG-ACCT] Open ALAC Issues

Alan Greenberg alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Wed Jan 27 18:20:33 UTC 2016

This was not meant to start a debate. It was one 
of the issues raised in the ALAC comments and I 
said I would list the open ones. I di not think 
it needs debate, just perhaps an aditional sentence added in the proposal.


At 27/01/2016 09:02 AM, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
>Dear All,
>I think people contuinue to go to the last 
>milimiter of the road and generate a new 
>discussion and debate about the number of 
>représentatives in Unincorprated 
>associattion  représentatives and start a new round of bebates and dispute
>Do we need this information now pls ?
>2016-01-27 6:14 GMT+01:00 Alan Greenberg 
><<mailto:alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>:
>As per my comment in the CCWG meeting earlier 
>today, here is a list of the issues still to be 
>resolved from the ALAC statement on the 3rd Draft Proposal.
>There are three issues currently under discussion.
>1. ICANN Mission and ensuring that contract 
>provisions will not be invalidated or be unenforceable.
>2. The issue regarding market mechanisms.
>3. Human Rights (original issue resolved but pending final wording).
>Issues to be addressed.
>1. The first is a relatively trivial one and 
>easily addressed. Rec# 4, in the section on replacing the Interim Board states:
>"SOs, ACs, and the Nominating Committee will 
>develop replacement processes that ensure the 
>Interim Board will not be in place for more than 120 days."
>The ALAC request that this be changed to:
>"SOs, ACs, and the Nominating Committee will 
>develop processes designed to replace Interim Board members within 120 days."
>By removing the word "ensure", this change, 
>while not altering the intent, goes along with 
>the recent practice of not putting hard 
>deadlines in the Bylaws, deadlines that for one 
>reason or another may not be met in a particular instance.
>2. Rec# 10, AoC. The Recommendation suggests 
>that as part of organizational reviews, the 
>AC/SO's accountability be included in the 
>review. The ALAC suggests that this be enshrined 
>in Article IV, Section 4.1 of the ICANN Bylaws.
>3. On page 14, item 2 of the draft proposal (and 
>on page 5 of Annex 1), it says "The members of 
>the unincorporated association would be 
>representatives of ICANN's Supporting 
>Organizations and Advisory Committees that wish 
>to participate." We have never discussed how 
>such members are identified. Presumably we 
>should to specify that each participating AC/SO 
>must identify who it's representative will be.
>Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
><mailto:Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org>Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160127/712b701c/attachment.html>

More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list