[CCWG-ACCT] FW: gTLD Auctions vs Travel Costs

[Grace Abuhamad]

Forwarding on behalf of Marika Konings.

From:  Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org>
Date:  Thursday, January 28, 2016 at 1:49 PM
To:  "James M. Bladel" <jbladel at godaddy.com>, Greg Shatan
<gregshatanipc at gmail.com>, Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>
Cc:  Accountability Cross Community
<accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
Subject:  Re: [CCWG-ACCT] gTLD Auctions vs Travel Costs

Please note that the updated discussion paper which factors in the input
received as a result of the public comment forum can be found here: New gTLD
Auction Proceeds ­ Update
<http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/new-gtld-auction-proceeds-07dec15-en.pdf> .

Best regards,

Marika

From: <accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of "James
M. Bladel" <jbladel at godaddy.com>
Date: Thursday 28 January 2016 at 12:40
To: Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>, Andrew Sullivan
<ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>
Cc: "accountability-cross-community at icann.org"
<accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] gTLD Auctions vs Travel Costs

To clarify: the CWG itself has not yet been convened.  It¹s only the
Drafting Team is that is starting up.

Thanks‹

J.


From: <accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Greg
Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com>
Date: Thursday, January 28, 2016 at 12:35
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>
Cc: "accountability-cross-community at icann.org"
<accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] gTLD Auctions vs Travel Costs

Andrew,

There was a discussion paper posted for public comment before Dublin, with
comments ended November 8.
https://www.icann.org/public-comments/new-gtld-auction-proceeds-2015-09-08-e
n
Subsequent to that, SO/AC chairs were invited on January 6 to propose
members of the charter Drafting Team that James Bladel mentioned.
Like you, I can't find evidence of this (other than having seen a copy of
the email referred to above), but I expect that will change once the DT
actually gets underway.

Greg

On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Andrew Sullivan <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com>
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 12:28:48PM -0500, Avri Doria wrote:
>> > At the very least, I believe they are holding these funds in a separate
>> > account, or something like that, until the Board decides what it want s
>> > to do.  Hard to know for sure.
> 
> There was a session about this in BA:
> 
> https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Pre-CWG+Workshop+on+ne
> w+gTLD+Auction+Proceeds
> 
> I am unable to find evidence that the relevant CWG has in fact been
> started, but I can never find anything on the ICANN website, so that's
> no guide as to whether it's happened.
> 
> A
> 
> --
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160128/3955bcc2/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5108 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160128/3955bcc2/smime-0001.p7s>