[CCWG-ACCT] Recommendation 11, 2/3 board threshold, GAC consensus, and finishing

Eric (Maule) Brunner-Williams ebw at abenaki.wabanaki.net
Fri Jan 29 00:51:39 UTC 2016


This participant has felt that several of the BC's "stress tests" were
brought in bad faith, and despite the time spent on the rat hole of the
GAC's internal process, no amount of lipstick on this pig (ST18) will
make it "a good idea" or "enhance accountability" or fix something now
broken in the Bylaws, and it isn't what the NTIA asked us to improve.

> In other words, does any member or participant think that this
> is a good idea, or enhances ICANN's accountability, or corrects a
> problem/deficiency in the Bylaws, or is needed for the transition? How
> about any chartering organization or constituent part of a chartering
> organization?

Eric Brunner-Williams
Eugene, Oregon

More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list