[CCWG-ACCT] Recommendation 11, 2/3 board threshold, GAC consensus, and finishing

Seun Ojedeji seun.ojedeji at gmail.com
Fri Jan 29 21:48:35 UTC 2016

On 29 Jan 2016 10:11 p.m., "Mueller, Milton L" <milton at gatech.edu> wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> >
> > Isn't it so that any guidance or PDP adopted by 2/3 by the GNSO must be
> > adopted by the Board?
> No, it is not. The GAC has routinely interfered with and altered GNSO
guidance via its "advice."
SO: Actually if this is true, I don't think its right to say GAC did this
but rather that board made this happen. We cannot have a board that does
not have option to decide independently be it on GAC advice/ALAC's or any
other policy outcome of an SO. As far as I am concerned, the most neutral
part of this community remains the board and they require adequate means of
exercising that role.

> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160129/30108539/attachment.html>

More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list