[CCWG-ACCT] let's stick to the substantive issues on over-empowering GAC and not get personal and start name-calling

[Seun Ojedeji]

So this does not generate another long thread and so that things are not
logged out of context. I was at the last meeting (though audio only), I did
not observe any "people painting" but i heard people repeating their points
as much as possible while the co-chairs tried as much as possible to
maintain focus of the discussion to maximise time.

Cheers!
On 29 Jan 2016 8:06 p.m., "Robin Gross" <robin at ipjustice.org> wrote:

> I was rather disappointed by the approach taken in yesterday’s meeting to
> address concerns about the excessive and improperly balanced power being
> given to GAC in this “accountability” process.
>
> Rather than trying to paint *people* as unsympathetic or
> “anti-government”, it is better to address the *arguments *presented by
> those who are uncomfortable with this level of control being handed to GAC
> through this process.  There are legitimate concerns about over-empowering
> one segment relative the existing structure and balance among SO-ACs, and
> those concerns should be addressed on their merit, without the need to
> resort to name-calling.
>
> Please don’t make this a debate about people who hold concerns, but rather
> stick to the substantive issues.
>
> Thanks,
> Robin
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160129/277ee41a/attachment.html>