[CCWG-ACCT] CCWG-Accountability - Draft Comment for Public Consultation on Articles of Incorporation (AOC)
Marilyn Cade
marilynscade at hotmail.com
Sun Jul 10 14:18:27 UTC 2016
fully support Sam's comments below.
Marilyn Cade
To: accountability-cross-community at icann.org
From: sam at lanfranco.net
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2016 08:52:42 -0400
CC: thomas at rickert.net
Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] CCWG-Accountability - Draft Comment for Public Consultation on Articles of Incorporation (AOC)
At
the risk of restating the obvious in simple terms I am taking a
whack at the
issue of ICANN and the public interest (global or otherwise).
There is no
agreed upon definitive definition of the public interest. This
is not because
there are different competing definitions but because of the
inherent nature of
the notion itself. The public interest is not like an element
(iron, copper,
helium) in the periodic chart where there is a fine grained
molecular test of
whether something is in, or not in, the public interest. It is a
concern across a broad
scope of human existence for the impact of policies and
practices carried out
by institutions, and in some cases individuals. Does an action
support, or
counter, the public interest (i.e., can I raise chickens in my
urban back yard)?
In
ICANN, it
is appropriate to have a commitment to policies and actions in
the global public
interest, without a defined definition of global public
interest. That is why
there is reference to the multistakeholder community through an
inclusive
bottom-up multistakeholder community process. Here is where a
nuance is
important. The task of that process is not to craft an ICANN
definitive
definition of the global public interest. The task of that
process is to stand
ready to be invoked whenever it appears that an ICANN policy or
practice is not
consistent with some element of the global public interest. The
purpose of that
process is to reach a consensus on the issue at hand, and not to
perform a test
against some gold standard benchmark of “global public
interest”. Of course,
with the passage of time, both inside ICANN and elsewhere a body
of “case
evidence” will build to assist that process.
In
the case
of society and justice, where there is no definitive definition
of justice, a broad
set of principles exist and on a case by case basis the
objective is that “justice
has to be seen to be done”. In the case of ICANN and a
commitment to the global
public interest, on a policy and practice case by case basis,
the global public
interest has to be seen to be served. To repeat, the task of the
ICANN
multistakeholder community is to remain vigilant with respect to
policies and practices
as they impact on the global public interest and remain as the
defenders of
those interests within the work of ICANN. In doing so it will
benefit from the
case evidence build up within ICANN and elsewhere, but its task
is not to
pursue a quest for a definitive definition of the global public
interest.
Sam
Lanfranco, NPOC/CSIH
--
------------------------------------------------
"It is a disgrace to be rich and honoured
in an unjust state" -Confucius
邦有道,贫且贱焉,耻也。邦无道,富且贵焉,耻也
------------------------------------------------
Dr Sam Lanfranco (Prof Emeritus & Senior Scholar)
Econ, York U., Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - M3J 1P3
email: Lanfran at Yorku.ca Skype: slanfranco
blog: http://samlanfranco.blogspot.com
Phone: +1 613-476-0429 cell: +1 416-816-2852
_______________________________________________
Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160710/cd8b9297/attachment.html>
More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community
mailing list