[CCWG-ACCT] CCWG-Accountability - Draft Comment for Public Consultation on Articles of Incorporation (AOC)

[Nigel Roberts]

It's rare for international law to apply to individuals or companies, 
unless you are suspected of war crimes, like Tony Blair or his American 
counterparts (who now will not travel outside the US), or unless you are 
involved (as ICANN is) in international private law, which is mst 
contractual in nature.

A literal reading of ICANN 3.0's Articles/By-laws shows that the 'global 
public interest' is something that the ICANN Community will decide - 
there is no external normative rule.

So, expandin upon Dr Lisse's critique . .

. . . please provide any authority for the proposition that the 'global 
interest' can be defined or agreed upon WITHIN 'the international law', 
which you seem to state it can.



On 10/07/16 19:46, Dr Eberhard W Lisse wrote:
> Besides that it may just be a case of "I know it when Imsee it" what
> "International Law" specifically would be used to define it.
>
> el
>
> --
> Sent from Dr Lisse's iPad mini 4
>
> On 10 Jul 2016, at 13:40, Dr. Mona Al-achkar JAbbour <maj_aj at hotmail.com
> <mailto:maj_aj at hotmail.com>> wrote:
>
>> I totally agree with Erich
>> Actually, the "Global Interest" cannot be defined and agreed on,
>> outside the international Law
>> Best
>> Mona
> [...]