[CCWG-ACCT] premature jurisdiction debates

[Dr Eberhard W Lisse]

I see this not as deciding where ICANN wants to have its jurisdiction,
but to look at what jurisdiction scenarios may be possible.  If only
to avoid ICANN to try and re-litigate not being subject to local (to
the place of business of the other party) jurisdiction again and
again.

el

On 2016-07-13 09:10, Dr. Mona Al-achkar JAbbour wrote:
> I completely agree with the following:
> _"jurisdiction is the application of political-legal power/
> authority over ICANN's work.  it is not an internal issue for the so
> called ICANN community.  it is most certainly something that fully
> involves the larger global public.  The manner in which this topic
> is dealt by WG2 will be watched closely as a judgement on ICANN's
> processes in the eyes of the global public._
> And I think, that this is the core issue, as well as, the main
> pillar that should support interests in a multi stakeholder system,
> as long as there is no global legislation to deal with such legal
> conflicts.
> Sincerely
> Mona 
[...]
-- 
Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse  \        / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist (Saar)
el at lisse.NA            / *     |   Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
PO Box 8421             \     /
Bachbrecht, Namibia     ;____/