[CCWG-ACCT] Request for Clarification on Threshold Issue

[Mueller, Milton L]

From: Jordan Carter [mailto:jordan at internetnz.net.nz]

Sorry, wrong. The assumption has been made and it is the same as the assumption that was made in the Third, Second and First Draft Reports. GAC is going to be listed in the fundamental bylaws as a decisional participant in the Empowered Community.

Huh? See below

The only way that could change would be if GAC advised it did not wish to do so. Same with any other group.

Which they haven’t done yet. Ergo, my statement below was correct.


On 1 March 2016 at 13:16, Mueller, Milton L <milton at gatech.edu<mailto:milton at gatech.edu>> wrote:
Whether one agrees with Brett or not, the fact remains that GAC has explicitly told us that it is _undecided_ on whether to be a decisional participant or not. Therefore, until we get a positive decision from them, we cannot assume that they will be by default. Greg S. was saying essentially the same thing:
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160301/8bbc27b8/attachment.html>