[CCWG-ACCT] Request for Clarification on Threshold Issue

Kavouss Arasteh kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com
Tue Mar 1 16:27:32 UTC 2016


Dear All,
Yo are too worried about something that we still do not know how it happens
The text approriate and clearly mention that if the No of Decision Making
SO and AC changed the threshold should be adjusted
That is more than sufficient.
People need to refrain concentrating/ focussing on a particular AC nor
envisage all possible senarios.
We are not wtritting Bylaws at this stage .
There is ample time and competent individuals to look at the matter once
happened.
Let us discontinue this counterproductive discussion
Regards
Kavouss

2016-03-01 16:32 GMT+01:00 Mueller, Milton L <milton at gatech.edu>:

>
>
>
>
> *From:* Jordan Carter [mailto:jordan at internetnz.net.nz]
>
> Sorry, wrong. The assumption has been made and it is the same as the
> assumption that was made in the Third, Second and First Draft Reports. GAC
> is going to be listed in the fundamental bylaws as a decisional participant
> in the Empowered Community.
>
>
>
> Huh? See below
>
>
>
> The only way that could change would be if GAC advised it did not wish to
> do so. Same with any other group.
>
>
>
> Which they haven’t done yet. Ergo, my statement below was correct.
>
>
>
>
>
> On 1 March 2016 at 13:16, Mueller, Milton L <milton at gatech.edu> wrote:
>
> Whether one agrees with Brett or not, the fact remains that GAC has
> explicitly told us that it is _*undecided*_ on whether to be a decisional
> participant or not. Therefore, until we get a positive decision from them,
> we cannot assume that they will be by default. Greg S. was saying
> essentially the same thing:
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160301/83cec107/attachment.html>


More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list