[CCWG-ACCT] Suggested change in working dynamics

[Greg Shatan]

Agree with James Gannon.

Greg

On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 2:54 AM, James Gannon <james at cyberinvasion.net>
wrote:

> I would disagree strongly with this, plenary working with the leadership
> team must decide the division of work which can be then done in the
> subgroups this was how we worked in CWG. We already have a small workgroup
> who does management that is our leadership team.
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On 4 Mar 2016, at 07:46, Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Dear All
> It is a two steps process
> 1 . One Working Group  ( small  work plan Group ) will plan the works of
> other groups by dividing the tasks before us to a number  of the required
> manageable  groups
> Then Plenary discuss and agreed on that , as appropriate
> 2.  Each one of the small group as agreed will work on the assigned tasks
> and report back to plenary for decision, advice and follow up actions
> Regards
> Ksvoudd
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 3 Mar 2016, at 23:06, Greg Shatan <gregshatanipc at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I read this as saying that each small group will plan its own work, not
> that there will be one small group that plans the work of all the small
> groups.  But if there is such a master planning group, I would like to be
> part of it.
>
> Greg
>
> On Thursday, March 3, 2016, Kavouss Arasteh <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear Co-Chairs
>> Thank for the initiative
>> For it sounds reasonable
>> Pls kindly note that I wish to be in the group which start planning the
>> tasks as outlined
>> Regards
>> Kavousd
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On 3 Mar 2016, at 20:34, León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <leonfelipe at sanchez.mx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> Now that our WS1 phase is approaching conclusion we would like to suggest
>> a change in dynamics of our work. We acknowledge that the volume of
>> calls and email exchange during this first phase was exhaustive and we want
>> to thank you and recognize all for your understanding and commitment.
>>
>> What we want to propose for WS2 is a more distributed working method in
>> order to leverage each of the member / participants skills while making the
>> best use of everyone’s time.
>>
>> A possible approach, to be discussed in our Marrakech meeting, is to
>> divide the work on the issues to be developed as part of WS2 into small
>> groups that would be tasked to develop a working plan for each of the
>> groups. These working plans would be presented to the CCWG plenary for
>> discussion and approval. Once the group has approved the different
>> working plans, including a comprehensive list of resources that would
>> involve carrying out each group’s work, each group will begin their work
>> and be responsible for scheduling their meetings and updating the CCWG on a
>> monthly basis. Working plans for each group should consider the use of
>> technology in order to foster inclusive participation from the wider
>> community and to diminish cost of carrying each group’s work.
>>
>> Our role as Co-Chairs would evolve to continue to provide facilitation
>> assistance where needed and coordinate interaction between the various
>> groups, the CCWG at large and ICANN Staff and Board.
>>
>> We look forward to this new phase in our work and welcome your thoughts
>> on this suggested way forward during our session tomorrow.
>>
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> Thomas, Mathieu and León
>> CCWG Co-Chairs
>> Saludos,
>>
>>
>>
>> León
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>
>> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160305/88d3adde/attachment-0001.html>