[CCWG-ACCT] NTIA Statement and more

[Adebunmi AKINBO]

Hi All.
Thanks Marilyn for the 2 minutes video interview.
Nothing edited.

+1 Sébastien Bachollet
We need to honor the founding members and staffs.

An independent ICANN is around the corner.
Hopes high.

Regards,
-Akinbo.





On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Sébastien Bachollet <
sebastien at bachollet.com> wrote:

> Thanks Marilyn
> And we need to recognize you (and some other) who start the whole process.
> From my POV after the creation of ICANN1.0 and the transformation in
> ICANN2.0, we are entering in a new phase (ICANN3.0?).
> All those steps were painful, time consuming but also well done (thanks to
> all the one involved).
> ICANN is in the curent situation because of the involvement of people.
> I hope this new phase will allow ICANN to serve always better the end
> users (both businesses and individuals) with all the stakeholder included.
> SeB
>
> *Skills are useful but diversity is essential.*
>
> Sébastien Bachollet
> +33 6 07 66 89 33
> Blog: http://sebastien.bachollet.fr/
> Mail: Sébastien Bachollet <sebastien at bachollet.com>
>
> De : Marilyn Cade <marilynscade at hotmail.com>
> Date : dimanche 13 mars 2016 11:07
> À : Sébastien Bachollet <sebastien at bachollet.com>, Seun Ojedeji <
> seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>, "accountability-cross-community at icann.org" <
> accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
> Objet : RE: [CCWG-ACCT] NTIA Statement and more
>
> Being accountable for policy coordination and standards development is an
> awesome responsibility.
>
> So, I have testified before the US Congress -- both House and Senate --
> only 7 times in various hearings, about the very early days of the
> Internet. And about multi stakeholder efforts -- Internet links Up,
> GetNetWise, Internet Summit, advancing Congressional support for funding
> for research -- sort of long ago stuff.  I helped to prepare other hearing
> agendas, when we first established the concept of ICANN, and then to help
> to recommend witnesses about why it would be good to move the functions
> that Jon Postel carried into a new entity -- which then, we called 'newco'.
>
>
> We have come a long way. The work of the CCWG-Acct and CWG-/related to
> IANA functions is remarkable.  We have a chance to update and inform
> members of the US Congress, and I hope that we think of this as a great
> opportunity.
>
> I do.
>
> I was there at the pre -beginning, so perhaps I really represent the
> minority now, who know how far we  have come.
> Really, when we created ICANN, with four staff, and no funding, we were
> not ready for this responsibility.
>
> Now we are.
> Time to celebrate this, but also to always recognize that the Internet is
> different in its breadth and scope than it was when we had less than 400 m
> users, most of whom came from less than 12 countries.  This is an important
> opportunity for all of us to be more current in our understanding and to
> take the responsibilities that we, the community, want ICANN to accept,
> very very seriously. NOT because of geo politics, but because this will
> fulfill the mission and functions that we designed ICANN for.
>
> I join with others in thanking the GAC, and recognizing with appreciation
> that they accepted observers in their deliberations.  As some may note,
> many of the other constitutiencies are moving into closed discussions on
> their policy negotiations/development of positions, so it may be viewed
> with a little irony that the GAC is more open that the rest of us, so to
> speak. :-)
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 08:18:46 +0100
> From: sebastien at bachollet.com
> To: seun.ojedeji at gmail.com; accountability-cross-community at icann.org
> Subject: Re: [CCWG-ACCT] NTIA Statement and more
>
> Thanks
> About the congressional hearing (US congress) it is interesting the
> wording of tittle.
> Privatizing the Internet Assigned Number Authority
> I am not sure we are privatizing the IANA.
> We are giving the starship to the full world?
> All the best
> SeB
>
> *Skills are useful but diversity is essential.*
>
> Sébastien Bachollet
> +33 6 07 66 89 33
> Blog: http://sebastien.bachollet.fr/
> Mail: Sébastien Bachollet <sebastien at bachollet.com>
>
> De : <accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Seun
> Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>
> Date : samedi 12 mars 2016 17:33
> À : <accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
> Objet : [CCWG-ACCT] NTIA Statement and more
>
> The following url could be of interest:
>
> NTIA Statement:
> https://www.ntia.doc.gov/blog/2016/reviewing-iana-transition-proposal
>
> Congressional hearing:
>
> https://energycommerce.house.gov/hearings-and-votes/hearings/privatizing-internet-assigned-number-authority
>
> Well the multistakeholder community has done it's part. Fingers crossed.
>
> Regards
>
> Sent from my LG G4
> Kindly excuse brevity and typos
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160313/ee9a0340/attachment.html>