[CCWG-ACCT] ICANN Board comments - Recommendation 3 - Fundamental Bylaws

Seun Ojedeji seun.ojedeji at gmail.com
Wed Mar 16 05:51:42 UTC 2016

Actually in practice, "one of the designator" does not apply because we
only have one(sole) designator as per the CCWG proposal. So what you are
saying would logical been logical if applied to the designator which in
context would be the community.

However I think the final proposal applies the inspection right to each
decisional SO/AC which implies there is really no community thing
(threshold) for inspection(para35 Annex 1) as it can be exercised by each
individual SO/AC but within the scope described in para32

Overall I guess the ship has sailed on this one so we should not dwell
further on it.


Sent from my LG G4
Kindly excuse brevity and typos
On 16 Mar 2016 03:27, "Andrew Sullivan" <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 10:14:41AM -0500, Greg Shatan wrote:
> > I agree with the result the Board came to (at least in part), but not the
> > reasoning.
> […]
> > exercise its powers through the Designator.  As a practical matter, this
> > can be solved by having any of the SOs or ACs exercise the inspection
> > right, so we're covered that way.)
> Since the bylaws don't contain the reasoning for why a particular
> arrangement happens, but instead just contains the arrangement, what
> difference does it make the reasons people have to believe the
> conclusion we seem to be reaching?  I like the emphasis on the
> practical matter: let's find a way to make the outcome right.
> It seems to me that making inspection a community power rather than
> one of the designator rather improves the value of inspection to the
> community, so we should embrace that conclusion (regardess of why
> people think it's the right one) and move on.
> Best regards,
> A
> --
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160316/90483380/attachment.html>

More information about the Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list