[CCWG-ACCT] TR: [bylaws-coord] For Review - Summary and Analysis of Public Comment and proposed revised ICANN Bylaws

[Kavouss Arasteh]

Dear Nigel,
Tks for your views
I have withdrawn the comments made as it was made unduly as results of
wrong reading of the text.
Sorry for that
Regards


2016-05-26 10:16 GMT+02:00 Nigel Roberts <nigel at channelisles.net>:

> Dear Kavouss
>
> You have a 100% perfect right to find parts of the new By-Laws
> unacceptable, and I should defend to the death your right to say so;
> however  you are, it seems to me, now tilting at windmills at this late
> stage. (I find the restriction of ICANN's committment to human rights to
> 'applicable law' (of which there is none) to be equally unacceptable.)
>
> However, it is what it is.
>
> The train has left the station. Elvis has left the building.
>
> If you could suggest any procedural method about which 'unacceptable'
> parts of the proposed Draft Bylaws could be objected to and changed at this
> phase in their adoption, I would be delighted to hear it.
>
> On the other hand, perhaps we should just take whatever gains we have made
> to dayte, and carry on the good work within WS2??
>
>
> Nigel
>
> On 26/05/16 08:37, Kavouss Arasteh wrote:
>
> This is a totally unacceptable proposal.
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160526/b30254c9/attachment-0001.html>