[CCWG-ACCT] [CWG-Stewardship] TR: [bylaws-coord] For Review - Summary and Analysis of Public Comment and proposed revised ICANN Bylaws

[Seun Ojedeji]

+1 Andrew! thanks to the board and the entire global "internet community"
that contributed to this rather rare activity. This step is an indication
that progress can be made amidst our diversity when there is an agreement
on the end-point.

A big thank you to the community for accommodating one another (to some
extent), we should improve on it even as we look towards the next task i.e
WS2.

That said, it's not over yet and I hope that the end-point would indeed be
achieved. A special occasion to celebrate this(perhaps at the next face 2
face) may be in order!

Regards

Sent from my LG G4
Kindly excuse brevity and typos
On 27 May 2016 6:45 p.m., "Andrew Sullivan" <ajs at anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:

> Dear colleagues,
>
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 11:36:04PM +1000, Chris Disspain wrote:
>
> > This has been a long, arduous and at times emotional
> > process. Through all of the debate, discussion, disagreement,
> > compromise and journey to consensus there have been many ups and
> > downs but I have never failed to be anything other than impressed
> > and sometimes overwhelmed by the commitment of those who chose to be
> > involved and who have gave their time and effort selflessly to this
> > process.
>
> I of course want to express my joy that we have crossed this milestone
> and my congratulations and thanks to everyone involved.  But also, I
> want to emphasise something in what Chris says above.
>
> Doing things in the sort of open ways that the various Internet
> operational communities do is hard work.  Feelings run high, and
> because we work on the Internet and in full view of everyone it takes
> a great deal of personal discipline and good will for people to come
> to compromises.  And yet, over and over again, the community delivers.
> "Awesome" is a much-overused word, but if ever I have felt awe it is
> in response to the ability of people from many different backgrounds
> and points of view, and with divergent needs, to come together in the
> best interests of the Internet.
>
> When I was in Washington earlier this week, there were a couple times
> when I thought the line of questioning contained an underlying
> implication: that you can't _really_ trust this sort of important
> responsibility to an amorphous bunch of people on the Internet.  But
> the Internet works because of the way we work things out.  We forge
> proposals and build the future in the furnace of public discussion.
> The Internet functions for everybody partly because everybody is
> invited to help make it function.
>
> We do, together, what none separately could do.  The doubters will
> continue to deride our ways as naïve and amateur, but our ways -- of
> coming to consensus and constantly respecting the value of that
> consensus -- give our results both effectiveness and the greatest
> legitimacy.  I am enormously grateful to be part of what can only
> properly be called a global community.
>
> Best regards,
>
> A
>
> --
> Andrew Sullivan
> ajs at anvilwalrusden.com
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20160528/8773d9d3/attachment-0001.html>