[CCWG-ACCT] Timeline for HR and Jurisdiction publications

[Seun Ojedeji]

Hello Kavouss,

<Filtered lists that I don't have posting rights to>

Note that my comment was not about supporting 19th because that isn't
feasible if we work with 60days but my support was rather for number of
days for comment period. Nevertheless more time is definitely better,
perhaps a balance would be end of March assuming they are going out for PC
this week.

Overall it all depends on the day the PC is set to go live. I would be fine
with the PC ending 2weeks (and beyond) after ICANN 58

Regards
Sent from my LG G4
Kindly excuse brevity and typos

On 18 Jan 2017 2:14 p.m., "Kavouss Arasteh" <kavouss.arasteh at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Dear Seun,
> Tks for your comments
> Pls see below. I am  strongly against the deadline  of 19 March for public
> comments see below
> Dear Co-Chair,
> Thank you very much for your thoughts and vision.
> However, I am not in favour of closing dates to be 19 March due to the
> fact that for some SO/AC, physical ( FACE -TO FACE) discussion is
> considerably contribute to the public comments thus we need to have
> sufficient time to react. I suggest that the response time to HR be
> prolonged to end 30 calendre days after the end of ICANN 58. Once again we
> should not do the thing harshly .Please allow those constituencies like GAC
> that only in a physical meeting they would be able to have full debate on
> the matter and then after have sufficient time to respond to the public
> comment.
> This is a formal proposal.
> I request ,at the same time, our dear chair ,Niels to also not to be in
> hurry and allow us to think, top reflect and to react .
> Regards
>
> 2017-01-18 14:03 GMT+01:00 Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>:
>
>> Hello Mathieu,
>>
>> I will be fine with a public comment that closes 60 days from publication
>> for both HR and jurisdiction. That means the date can't be 19th since the
>> PC has not yet commenced.
>>
>> That said, I wrote to Niel on the HR list indicating that it might be
>> prudent to get answers to the questions put to the Co-Chairs of the CCWG
>> plenary before putting the FoI to PC. This is because the questions sent in
>> by Niel has a lot to do with the FoI. I don't think we've gotten a response
>> to those questions yet?
>>
>> If we want to send the document for public comment anyway then it should
>> clearly state in the preamble whether the points listed in Annex12 were
>> considered during the development of the FoI.
>>
>> Regards
>> Sent from my LG G4
>> Kindly excuse brevity and typos
>>
>> On 18 Jan 2017 11:50, "Mathieu Weill" <mathieu.weill at afnic.fr> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Colleagues,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Although it is uncertain exactly when the questionnaire for Jurisdiction
>>> and the public comment for Human Rights will actually be published the
>>> Co-Chairs would suggest that the closing date for both of these be after
>>> the Copenhagen meeting.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The reasoning behind this is that at best the standard 42 days
>>> consultation period would end immediately prior to the Copenhagen - this
>>> would imply chartering organizations and community members would be
>>> considering this while they are preparing for Copenhagen - which as Cheryl
>>> Langdon-Orr has pointed out on our last plenary is not an ideal situation.
>>> Additionally staff would not have enough time to prepare the report on
>>> these for our consideration in Copenhagen.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Additionally the jurisdiction questionnaire is meant to be considered by
>>> a wider community and as such it would be good to extend the standard
>>> period to 60 days to allow everyone ample opportunity to answer the
>>> questionnaire.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> As such we would recommend that the closing period for the Human Rights
>>> public consultation be Sunday 19 March 23:59 UTC and that the Jurisdiction
>>> questionnaire request responses within 60 days of the initial publication.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you in advance for your feedbacks on this proposal.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Thomas, Leon & Mathieu
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
>> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/accountability-cross-community/attachments/20170118/ff8b7ac2/attachment-0001.html>