[CCWG-ACCT] [Ws2-jurisdiction] Documents for upcoming meeting

[avri doria]

Hi,

At the very least it means that there should a minority statement or
several minority statements reflecting the lack of unity in the group.

avri



On 15-Jun-17 09:34, Paul Rosenzweig wrote:
>
> This cannot go unanswered.  After nearly a year of fruitless
> discussion, about issues that the majority of the Subgroup thought
> were irrelevant and/or outside of our mandate, the subgroup finally
> decided to move on.  The questions were amply aired and debated.  This
> was not a coup from the top.  On the contrary it reflect the views of
> the subgroup which simply did not share your view. 
>
>  
>
> Paul
>
>  
>
> Paul Rosenzweig
>
> paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com
> <mailto:paul.rosenzweig at redbranchconsulting.com>
>
> O: +1 (202) 547-0660
>
> M: +1 (202) 329-9650
>
> VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739
>
> www.redbranchconsulting.com <http://www.redbranchconsulting.com/>
>
> My PGP Key:
> https://keys.mailvelope.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9A830097CA066684
>
>  
>
> *From:*accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org
> [mailto:accountability-cross-community-bounces at icann.org] *On Behalf
> Of *parminder
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 15, 2017 1:32 AM
> *To:* ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org; Accountability Cross Community
> <accountability-cross-community at icann.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [CCWG-ACCT] [Ws2-jurisdiction] Documents for upcoming
> meeting
>
>  
>
> It gives me no pleasure to report that a coup from the top was
> achieved at yesterday's call based meeting of the jurisdiction
> sub-group. The CCWG and sub group chairs together simply decided that
> the CCWG jurisdiction sub-group will no longer discuss the
> jurisdiction question, however paradoxical and comical it sounds. What
> they actually proclaimed was of course more circuitously worded --
> something like, people can discuss the jurisdiction question as long
> as it is not, even by any distant implication, about any change in the
> jurisdictional status quo!! Wonder, what really then is the
> jurisdiction issue that they can discuss, but then Orwell did tell us
> a lot about such political speak. One is also reminded of the
> consumer's unlimited right to buy black Ford cars.
>
> regretfully, parminder
>
> On Wednesday 14 June 2017 11:50 AM, Greg Shatan wrote:
>
>     All,
>
>      
>
>     In addition to the agenda, the summaries we will discuss are attached.
>
>      
>
>     Also attached is the chart containing the "raw" statements made
>     during the prior call (plus the changes suggested by Thiago on the
>     list), as well as a distillation of those statements (since a
>     number were essentially repetitive or overlapping).
>
>      
>
>     Greg
>
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>
>     Ws2-jurisdiction mailing list
>
>     Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org <mailto:Ws2-jurisdiction at icann.org>
>
>     https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ws2-jurisdiction
>
>  
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> Accountability-Cross-Community at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus