[atrt2] Meeting in Beijing

[Alan Greenberg]

I guess one cannot proof-read something too many times. Yes, the 
dates before the meeting are 5 and 6.

So the options I listed should be:

a) 5, 6 (Before)
b) 12, 13 (After with no break)
c) 13, 14 (After with a break)
d) 6, 12 (Split with no break)
e) 6, 13 (Split with a break)

Alan

At 23/02/2013 03:30 AM, Lise Fuhr wrote:

>It seems that the dates that Alan has suggested are bit wrong. 
>Saturday is the 6 April and if that is what is meant by d) this is 
>perfect for me. I agree we should meet in Beijing.
>Best
>Lise
>
>
>Den 23/02/2013 kl. 00.36 skrev David Conrad <drc at virtualized.org>:
>
> > I agree with Avri both in that I can live with any of the options 
> but see some advantage in (d).
> >
> > Regards,
> > -drc
> >
> > On Feb 22, 2013, at 3:25 PM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Thanks for starting the conversation.
> >>
> >> I agree with the reasoning and can live with any of the options.
> >> My preference is for (d).
> >>
> >> I like the idea of getting a day in before, i.e. bracketing the 
> ICANN meeting with our meeting.
> >>
> >> avri
> >>
> >>
> >> On 22 Feb 2013, at 18:18, Alan Greenberg wrote:
> >>
> >>> To kick off the discussion, Since a large number of our group will be
> >>> in Beijing, I don't think that we can afford not to meet there. We
> >>> are starting far later than originally planned, but still trying to
> >>> make the original deadline of 31-Dec. I think a 2nd face-to-face
> >>> meeting near the start of our work is valuable, so it is either
> >>> Beijing, or moving the entire group to somewhere else very close (in
> >>> time) to the Beijing meeting.
> >>>
> >>> If we are looking for two days (which seems reasonable to me), there
> >>> seem to be several potential options from the two days preceding the
> >>> start of many meetings (Fri Apr 4, Sat Apr 5) and the three days
> >>> after (Fri Apr 12, Sat Apr 13, Sun Apr 14). Note that some of us are
> >>> scheduled for other meetings on Sat, Apr 5 (I am), but probably not
> >>> enough to rule out that day.
> >>>
> >>> If we were to meet only after the ICANN week, my inclination would be
> >>> to make it Sat-Sun to give people just a bit of time to clear their
> >>> minds and get ready.
> >>>
> >>> So the options seems to be:
> >>>
> >>> a) 4, 5 (Before)
> >>> b) 12, 13 (After with no break)
> >>> c) 13, 14 (After with a break)
> >>> d) 5, 12 (Split with no break)
> >>> e) 5, 13 (Split with a break)
> >>>
> >>> I can live with any of these options but have a preference for a or c.
> >>>
> >>> Alan
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> atrt2 mailing list
> >>> atrt2 at icann.org
> >>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> atrt2 mailing list
> >> atrt2 at icann.org
> >> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > atrt2 mailing list
> > atrt2 at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2
> >
>
>_______________________________________________
>atrt2 mailing list
>atrt2 at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2