[atrt2] Egalitarian listing of ATRT2 members?

Alan Greenberg alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Sat Feb 23 21:27:37 UTC 2013


Fine with me. The thought was not to imply weighting but just 
documenting what had happened.

Alan

At 23/02/2013 03:13 PM, Steve Crocker wrote:
>Speaking as one of the co-selectors, our first concern was picking a 
>team that had strong experience and expertise.  We did pay a tiny 
>bit of attention to the fact that people had applied via the 
>Independent Experts route, and we recognized that if we didn't pick 
>any from that list it would send a negative signal about the utility 
>of applying via that path.  But, at least from my viewpoint, I don't 
>think of someone chosen via that path as having any greater or 
>lesser weight or any more or less specific role than members coming 
>from the SOs and ACs.  Bottom line: I think we've already documented 
>the lineage, and my preference would be to drop all references to 
>lineage going forward.  Annotating the names of the chair and vice 
>or co-chair is quite different and definitely appropriate.
>
>Steve
>
>On Feb 23, 2013, at 11:56 AM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> wrote:
>
> > I agree that there need no explicit separation. When/if we 
> publish lists, it would be good to mention the lineage, much as we 
> typically put (Chair) after a name. But no need to differentiate 
> while we are working.
> >
> > Alan
> >
> > At 23/02/2013 02:16 PM, Steve Crocker wrote:
> >> During the organization call Friday I was using a print out of 
> the members.  It had separate sections for the Volunteer Review 
> Team members, the Independent Experts and the Ex-Officios.  My 
> preference is for all of the team members to be considered 
> uniformly part of the same team, leaving behind the history of how 
> we were selected.  However, if the team prefers to retain the 
> distinctions, it's certainly workable.
> >>
> >> This is a small point, but since I found myself reacting 
> internally  and, to some extent, tripping over it while I chaired 
> the call, I thought I'd mention it.
> >>
> >> Preferences?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Steve
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> atrt2 mailing list
> >> atrt2 at icann.org
> >> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2
> >




More information about the atrt2 mailing list