[atrt2] Open Archive

[David Conrad]

Avri,

Thanks for the clarification.  I don't have qualms about the meetings being listened to. There might be some concerns about logistics, particularly for live streaming and/or room size for in-person meetings (I'd have no clue how big a room to reserve myself).  

Pragmatically speaking, would making transcripts of the meetings publicly available be sufficient?

Regards,
-drc

On Mar 4, 2013, at 3:08 PM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Open in the sense of being listened to, was my point.
> I was not necessarily thinking of the LA sessions, especially, being physically open. 
> 
> avri
> 
> On 4 Mar 2013, at 17:16, David Conrad wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Just so I understand: the desire is to have meetings be open to anyone? Does this also hold true for the in-person meetings?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> -drc
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> atrt2 mailing list
> atrt2 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2