[atrt2] Preparation for Buenos Aires
Alan Greenberg
alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Sat Oct 26 03:09:18 UTC 2013
It had nothing to do with cost. See my earlier reply. It was just a
matter of bandwidth to organize a presentation, lack of time to
adequately publicize and hold it prior to BA, and history of poor
turnouts. I personally supported a webinar, but there was little
other interest and I was not in a position to take it on myself.
Regarding a public meeting, I tend to agree. If I recall correctly,
at least part of the problem was the lack of time given that we
committed to ATRT people being there for such a few number of days,
coupled with the very tight scheduling given the 4-day week and our
decision to seclude ourselves on Monday.
Alan
At 25/10/2013 08:50 PM, Avri Doria wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Was it a matter of cost to not have the webinar?
>
>I apologize that I was not able to be at the meeting that discussed
>this, but I was traveling. In any case, I would assume any decision
>we make as chair/v-chair is something that the rest of the ATRT gets
>to overrule. So perhaps I loss my vote by not having been at a
>meeting I should have been at, but if others thinks we need to more,
>perhaps we need to consider it.
>
>Also I think it may be a mistake to not have a public session at
>BA. Might give the appearance that we are hiding.
>
>While it is good to get a good size crowd of participants, it is
>important to be accessible to the community as part of our own
>accountability - we have to be available to the flight of incoming
>tomatoes even if one a few people come to talk. I have been at the
>IGF2013 which just ended, and some of us made a big deal of the AOC
>mechanisms, to not be visible to a new participant who may drift to
>our meeting based on ICANN's very visible presence in Bali might not
>be the best option. but you may be right, no one may come - I just
>don't think that is the point.
>
>One problem with only meeting with the SO/AC is that it misses the
>large part of population who are not part of of these organizations,
>including any newcomers there may be.
>
>just saying,
>
>avri
>
>
>On 26 Oct 2013, at 00:56, Brian Cute wrote:
>
> > Fiona,
> >
> > That was the conclusion we reached after lengthy discussion with
> ICANN Staff. I am open to ways we can get the Community's
> attention to the Report and get input, the webinar just did not
> present itself as good return for time and energy spent.
> >
> > Best,
> > Brian
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Alan Greenberg
> <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> wrote:
> > Not sure if Brian is around or not, but I can answer most of this.
> >
> > The Chair and VCs had an extensive discussion on the issue of a
> webinar. Even though such webinars are typically poorly attended,
> several of us thought that it would be a good idea, but just not
> practical given the short time available to do it (and implicit
> short warning for participants). It is another of the results of
> our compressed time-frame.
> >
> > There will not be an open public meeting in BA (which have been
> so poorly attended in the past) but we will be meeting individually
> with pretty much all SGs. The currently planned schedule is at
> https://community.icann.org/display/ATRT2/Buenos+Aires+-+18-20+November+2013.
> >
> > Alan
> >
> >
> > At 25/10/2013 09:49 AM, Fiona Asonga wrote:
> > Hallo Brian,
> >
> > I would like to re-visit an old proposal on getting more public
> participation and interest in the draft final report we have
> circulated for public comments. We had considered having a webinar
> before teh ICANN Meeting on the proposed recommendations so that
> folks coming to Buenos Aires can begin thinking about the proposed
> recommendations. I don't know if we shall still be able to have
> this webinar and if the team would able to put in about half hour
> to an hour to discuss with the community members interested on the
> draft document already in the public domain.
> >
> > Secondly, will we work again like we did in Bejing and Durban
> meeting individual and or groups or focus on the public forum?
> >
> > Kind regards
> >
> > Fiona Asonga
> > _______________________________________________
> > atrt2 mailing list
> > atrt2 at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > atrt2 mailing list
> > atrt2 at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > atrt2 mailing list
> > atrt2 at icann.org
> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>atrt2 mailing list
>atrt2 at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2
More information about the atrt2
mailing list