[atrt2] Prioritization Doodle Poll

[Denise Michel]

Dear Olivier,

For the sake of clarity (and you may have gotten dropped from the last call
when this was discussed?) -- the Team decided to consider prioritizing and
asked staff to send this poll. This came out of a request from Zhang
Xinsheng to prioritize the recommendations.

Regards,
Denise


On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com>wrote:

>  Dear Larisa,
>
> I am sorry but I will not prioritise any of these recommendations. This is
> purely an ICANN thing to prioritise things which are all important, for the
> sole purpose of demoting the importance of some of the recommendations
> because let's face it, that's exactly what we are doing.
> There are 12 recommendations; ICANN is purporting to be a world class
> organisation... and it needs to have a committee help it throttle the rate
> at which these recommendations are implemented?
> For this reason, and I apologise for this, I shall not fill the doodle
> poll.
> Kind regards,
>
> Olivier
>
>
>
> On 18/12/2013 05:48, Larisa B. Gurnick wrote:
>
>  Dear ATRT2 Members,
>
>
>
> As discussed on the ATRT2 call on 17 December, please indicate which
> recommendations you would consider to be “priority” recommendations by
> voting in the Doodle Poll *http://doodle.com/yxidhmrupcbfmb4u
> <http://doodle.com/yxidhmrupcbfmb4u>.  This Doodle Poll will close by 23:59
> UTC on 18 December.*  Depending on the results of this Poll, further
> discussion and consideration will be given, via email, to the possibility
> of including prioritization guidance in the Final Report.
>
>
>
>
>
> Here is a recap of the recommendations for ease of reference:
>
>
>
> #1        The Board should develop objective measures for determining the
> quality of ICANN Board members and the success of Board improvement
> efforts, and analyze those findings over time.
>
>
>
> #2        The Board should develop metrics to measure the effectiveness of
> the Board’s functioning and improvement efforts, and publish the materials
> used for training to gauge levels of improvement.
>
>
>
> #3        The Board should conduct qualitative/quantitative studies to
> determine how the qualifications of Board candidate pools change over time
> , and regularly assess Director’s compensation levels against prevailing
> standards.
>
>
>
> #4        The Board should continue supporting cross-community engagement
> aimed at developing an understanding of the distinction between policy
> development and policy implementation.  Develop complementary mechanisms
> whereby the Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees (SO/AC) can
> consult with the Board on matters, including, but not limited to policy,
> implementation and administrative matters, on which the Board makes
> decisions.
>
>
>
> #5        The Board should review redaction standards for Board documents,
> Document Information Disclosure Policy (DIDP) and any other ICANN documents
> to create a single published redaction policy. Institute a process to
> regularly evaluate redacted material to determine if redactions are still
> required and if not, ensure that redactions are removed.
>
>
>
> #6        GAC-related recommendation
>
>
>
> #7        The Board should explore mechanisms to improve public comment
> through adjusted time allotments, forward planning regarding the number of
> consultations given anticipated growth in participation, and new tools that
> facilitate participation.  The Board also should establish a process under
> the Public Comment Process where those who commented or replied during the
> Public Comment and/or Reply Comment period(s) can request changes to the
> synthesis reports in cases where they believe the Staff incorrectly
> summarized their comment(s).
>
>
>
> #8        To support public participation, the Board should review
> capacity of the language services department versus the Community need for
> the service using Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and make relevant
> adjustments such as improving translation quality and timeliness and
> interpretation quality. ICANN should implement continuous improvement of
> translation and interpretation services including benchmarking of
> procedures used by international organizations such as the United Nations.
>
>
>
> #9        Consideration of decision-making inputs and appeals processes
>
>
>
> #10      The Board should improve the effectiveness of cross-community
> deliberations
>
>
>
> #11      Effectiveness of the Review Process
>
>
>
> #12      Financial Accountability and Transparency
>
>
>
>
>
> *Larisa B. Gurnick*
>
> Consultant/Senior Director, Organizational Reviews
>
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>
> larisa.gurnick at icann.org
>
> 310 383-8995
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> atrt2 mailing listatrt2 at icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2
>
>
> --
> Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhDhttp://www.gih.com/ocl.html
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> atrt2 mailing list
> atrt2 at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/atrt2
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/atrt2/attachments/20131218/25d3dcdc/attachment-0001.html>