[bc-gnso] BC Position on PEDNER Initial Report

[Philip Sheppard]

Berry,
thanks for some excellent work on this.
I support the position with the following changes.
 
Clarity
I believe the outside world will find difficulty in distinguishing between BC WG
members in a minority and a BC position.
We need some clarity here.
Let me try.
The WG model allows anyone to join. There will be members of the WG who happen
to be BC members but who do not claim to represent the BC.  Their view should
not appear in a BC paper. 
(General point for the BC EXCOMM: The BC should have an internal process to
distinguish its delegates to a WG from any one else who happens to join a WG).
 
Regardless of the existence of the WG, what we are now writing is a BC position
paper. So in any case we should delete any references to the views of the BC
members on the WG. (If the views of BC members on the WG are informative put
that in an internal BC email and say who is saying what.)
 
Hope this helps.
 
Philip
 
 
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/bc-gnso/attachments/20100805/41d93c8d/attachment.html>