[bc-gnso] FILED: BC "Early Input" on EPDP for Temp Spec on GDPR

[Hammock, Statton]

Excellent statement of the BC position. Thanks Mason, Tim and Margie.

Stat

Statton Hammock
V.P. Global Policy & Industry Development
MarkMonitor / Part of Clarivate Analytics
Ph.:  415.971.3561
statton.hammock at markmonitor.com

From: Bc-gnso <bc-gnso-bounces at icann.org> On Behalf Of Steve DelBianco
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2018 6:56 AM
To: BC List <bc-gnso at icann.org>
Subject: [bc-gnso] FILED: BC "Early Input" on EPDP for Temp Spec on GDPR

Today we filed the BC’s “Early Input”requested by the EPDP on the Temp Spec (attached).

Thanks again to Mason, Tim, and Margie for drafting.


From: Steven DelBianco <sdelbianco at netchoice.org<mailto:sdelbianco at netchoice.org>>
Date: Wednesday, August 29, 2018 at 8:45 AM
To: BC Private <bc-private at icann.org<mailto:bc-private at icann.org>>
Cc: Mason Cole <mcole at 5x5com.com<mailto:mcole at 5x5com.com>>, Alex Deacon <alex at colevalleyconsulting.com<mailto:alex at colevalleyconsulting.com>>, Tim Chen <tim at domaintools.com<mailto:tim at domaintools.com>>
Subject: FOR REVIEW by 30-Aug: draft BC comment on ICANN's latest proposal for access to non-public Whois

Correction: the attached draft is actually “early input” on the expedited PDP (EPDP) for the Temp Spec.  This was requested by the chair of the EPDP WG, Kurt Pritz.

We are ALSO working on a draft reaction to ICANN’s latest unified access model.


From: Steven DelBianco <sdelbianco at netchoice.org<mailto:sdelbianco at netchoice.org>>
Date: Tuesday, August 28, 2018 at 10:12 PM
To: BC Private <bc-private at icann.org<mailto:bc-private at icann.org>>
Cc: Mason Cole <mcole at 5x5com.com<mailto:mcole at 5x5com.com>>, Alex Deacon <alex at colevalleyconsulting.com<mailto:alex at colevalleyconsulting.com>>, Tim Chen <tim at domaintools.com<mailto:tim at domaintools.com>>
Subject: FOR REVIEW by 30-Aug: draft BC comment on ICANN's latest proposal for access to non-public Whois

As I noted on last BC call and Policy Calendar, ICANN Org published a “Possible Unified Access Model Published for Community Input<https://www.icann.org/news/blog/possible-unified-access-model-published-for-community-input>” last week.    ICANN is seeking public input, but not as part of a formal public comment period.   There is no formal deadline, but ICANN is looking for reactions ASAP.

Thanks to Mason Cole, Tim Chen, Margie Milam, and Alex Deacon for quickly drafting a BC comment (attached).  This draft largely reflects positions the BC has taken on ICANN’s reactions to GDPR.

I will probe ICANN about the “deadline” for this comment.  Meanwhile, please review immediately and provide reactions before 31-Aug.

--Steve




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/bc-gnso/attachments/20180903/8ad7ec7e/attachment.html>