[bylaws-coord] Interim Relief in Reconsideration Context

Wed May 4 15:36:06 UTC 2016

I personally do not think that the reconsideration process lends itself to some sort of interim stay mechanism.

J. Beckwith Burr
Neustar, Inc. / Deputy General Counsel & Chief Privacy Officer
1775 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington D.C. 20006
Office: +1.202.533.2932  Mobile: +1.202.352.6367 / neustar.biz<http://www.neustar.biz>

From: <Gregory>, Holly <holly.gregory at sidley.com<mailto:holly.gregory at sidley.com>>
Date: Wednesday, May 4, 2016 at 7:01 AM
To: Mathieu Weill <mathieu.weill at afnic.fr<mailto:mathieu.weill at afnic.fr>>, Thomas Rickert <thomas at rickert.net<mailto:thomas at rickert.net>>, "bylaws-coord at icann.org<mailto:bylaws-coord at icann.org>" <bylaws-coord at icann.org<mailto:bylaws-coord at icann.org>>, León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <leonfelipe at sanchez.mx<mailto:leonfelipe at sanchez.mx>>
Cc: Sidley ICANN CCWG <sidleyicannccwg at sidley.com<mailto:sidleyicannccwg at sidley.com>>, ACCT-Staff <acct-staff at icann.org<mailto:acct-staff at icann.org>>, ICANN-Adler <ICANN at adlercolvin.com<mailto:ICANN at adlercolvin.com>>
Subject: Re: [bylaws-coord] Interim Relief in Reconsideration Context

Hi Mathieu, I also wasn't clear on whether this was resolved on the call but wanted to provide this analysis for clarification.  Holly

Sent with Good (www.good.com)

________________________________
From: Mathieu Weill
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2016 01:46:33 AM
To: Gregory, Holly; Thomas Rickert; bylaws-coord at icann.org<mailto:bylaws-coord at icann.org>; León Felipe Sánchez Ambía
Cc: Sidley ICANN CCWG; ICANN-Adler; Samantha Eisner; ACCT-Staff
Subject: RE: Interim Relief in Reconsideration Context

Thank you Holly,

I do not recall that we mentioned we would change direction on this issue during the call ? Maybe I missed something ? If needed, we can forward your note on this, but I don’t want to reopen a discussion if it’s closed and consistent with our previous direction, so I’d appreciate if other participants in the call could offer their view of where we landed on this.

Best
Mathieu

De : Gregory, Holly [mailto:holly.gregory at sidley.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 4 mai 2016 00:39
À : Thomas Rickert; Mathieu Weill; bylaws-coord at icann.org<mailto:bylaws-coord at icann.org>; León Felipe Sánchez Ambía
Cc : Sidley ICANN CCWG; ICANN-Adler; Samantha Eisner
Objet : RE: Interim Relief in Reconsideration Context

I inadvertently omitted Leon on my first email.  My apologies.

Sent with Good (www.good.com<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.good.com&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=1-1w8mU_eFprE2Nn9QnYf01XIV88MOwkXwHYEbF2Y_8&m=jV0FKImQsWNEooxl6Dw_MquI33GxtNhfWINd-8T1owU&s=_runafcdKDxssPVEnz2EN4j1uORI51YjUfZaJDANqOg&e=>)

________________________________
From: Gregory, Holly
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 04:58:00 PM
To: Thomas Rickert; Mathieu Weill; bylaws-coord at icann.org<mailto:bylaws-coord at icann.org>
Cc: Sidley ICANN CCWG; ICANN-Adler; Samantha Eisner
Subject: FW: Interim Relief in Reconsideration Context
Please see note below which I had Rebecca draft on my behalf as I ran to airplane.  Please post to CCWG list serve.

We followed the instructions regarding the certified issue below as specifically directed. We would ask that this fact be included in your comment letter if the direction is now being changed.  Kind regards, Holly

Sent with Good (www.good.com<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.good.com&d=CwMFaQ&c=Od00qP2XTg0tXf_H69-T2w&r=1-1w8mU_eFprE2Nn9QnYf01XIV88MOwkXwHYEbF2Y_8&m=jV0FKImQsWNEooxl6Dw_MquI33GxtNhfWINd-8T1owU&s=_runafcdKDxssPVEnz2EN4j1uORI51YjUfZaJDANqOg&e=>)

________________________________
From: Grapsas, Rebecca
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 04:48:56 PM
To: Gregory, Holly
Subject: Interim Relief in Reconsideration Context
Dear Co-Chairs,
Further to Brett Schaefer’s comment raised on today’s CCWG call regarding the availability of interim relief in the context of a Request for Reconsideration, this question was previously certified to the CCWG.  In its responses to questions dated April 12, the CCWG indicated that interim relief taking the form of a stay/suspension would not apply to Reconsideration (pasted below and attached).
Extract from Draft Answers to CCWG Questions for Bylaws Coordination Group, 12 April 2016:

20. Article 4 ACCOUNTABILITY AND REVIEW

Article 4 and Appendix D Article 4 do not specify if, after a Requestor or the EC requests review or reconsideration, the decision is suspended pending resolution. This would seem to be necessary to prevent irreversible harm.

CCWG Response 11 April:

·        Can apply to IRP if requested, not applicable to Reconsideration.

Best regards,
Holly

HOLLY J. GREGORY
Partner and Co-Chair
Corporate Governance & Executive Compensation Practice Group
Sidley Austin LLP
787 Seventh Avenue
New York, NY 10019
+1 212 839 5853
holly.gregory at sidley.com<mailto:holly.gregory at sidley.com>
www.sidley.com<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.sidley.com_&d=DQMF-g&c=MOptNlVtIETeDALC_lULrw&r=62cJFOifzm6X_GRlaq8Mo8TjDmrxdYahOP8WDDkMr4k&m=17su8krpP1joEiQF8A3X8CNGCNXcExkLvZIaaWBtexc&s=XdZxPr4RWTaLkOgojKlEGpsS0prgfZjf-Uu0g4yN0fM&e=>

****************************************************************************************************
This e-mail is sent by a law firm and may contain information that is privileged or confidential.
If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the e-mail and any attachments and notify us
immediately.

****************************************************************************************************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/bylaws-coord/attachments/20160504/66329944/attachment-0001.html>