[Capacity-Building-WG] Fwd: [atlas-ii-survey] Possible Consolidation of the ATLAS II & Capacity WG Surveys ? (Was: Fwd: Survey)

Tijani BENJEMAA tijani.benjemaa at topnet.tn
Wed Sep 18 08:24:11 UTC 2013

Thank you Olivier




De : capacity-building-wg-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
[mailto:capacity-building-wg-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] De la part de
Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
Envoyé : mardi 17 septembre 2013 19:25
À : At-Large Capacity Building WG
Objet : [Capacity-Building-WG] Fwd: [atlas-ii-survey] Possible Consolidation
of the ATLAS II & Capacity WG Surveys ? (Was: Fwd: Survey)


Dear Capacity Building WG members,

please be so kind to see below, for your information, the message sent to
the ATLAS II Survey Team.
Kind regards,


-------- Original Message -------- 


[atlas-ii-survey] Possible Consolidation of the ATLAS II & Capacity WG
Surveys ? (Was: Fwd: Survey)


Tue, 17 Sep 2013 19:29:15 +0200


Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond  <mailto:ocl at gih.com> <ocl at gih.com>


atlas-ii-survey at atlarge.icann.org
<mailto:atlas-ii-survey at atlarge.icann.org>
<atlas-ii-survey at atlarge.icann.org>

Dear all,

please be so kind to find the email in which Tijani Ben Jemaa has suggested
the following:

- merge the ATLAS II survey with the ALS Capacity building survey
- re-arrange the survey into sub-sections separating the questions aimed at
satisfying the needs of the ATLAS II and the needs of the Capacity Building

I must admit that I was initially quite sceptical about joining the two
surveys together because I was worried that it would take too much time...
and that it would end up being way too large.
But Tijani's suggestion that it is in 3 parts was a very welcome suggestion.
This way, we have the questions very clear.

The two input documents, are at:

At-Large Capacity Building WG Survey Group Workspace

ATLAS II Consolidated Draft

Since we need to move quickly on this, please let us know if this proposal
is good for you.
Staff will shortly send a Doodle poll to arrange the next Atlas II Survey
call where a decision will be made and a final version of the survey be
produced - ready to send to all of our ALSes. Meanwhile, At-Large Staff are
already updating the list of ALS representatives.

Kind regards,


-------- Original Message -------- 




Fri, 13 Sep 2013 09:51:04 +0100


Tijani BENJEMAA  <mailto:tijani.benjemaa at topnet.tn>
<tijani.benjemaa at topnet.tn>


 <mailto:tijani.benjemaa at topnet.tn> <tijani.benjemaa at topnet.tn>


'Wolf Ludwig'  <mailto:wolf.ludwig at comunica-ch.net>
<wolf.ludwig at comunica-ch.net>


'Dev Anand Teelucksingh'  <mailto:devtee at gmail.com> <devtee at gmail.com>,
'Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond'  <mailto:ocl at gih.com> <ocl at gih.com>, 'ICANN
At-Large Staff'  <mailto:staff at atlarge.icann.org> <staff at atlarge.icann.org>

Good morning Wolf,


The capacity building working group met (teleconference) yesterday and
discussed the issue of preparing the ALSes for the ATLAS II summit. We
agreed that we are already late and need to start immediately the process.
The first step is to issue the survey to know what are the expectations of
the ALSes to define a capacity building program that would give them the
minimum information and knowledge necessary to participate efficiently in
the Summit.


The issue of an ALS receiving 2 survey in the same period was raised; the
decision in the WG was to contact you and propose that we issue a single
survey with 3 parts:

Part 1: General information about the ALS

Part 2: ATLAS II 

Part 3: Capacity building


I know that you refused to merge both surveys because it will be a too long
survey and the objectives are different. I totally agree with your arguments
and the WG considered them and propose that the part dedicated to the
capacity building be shortened and restricted to the issues of capacity
building only. Also, if you agree, we will use the part 1 for both of us
avoiding the duplication.


Wolf, the main reason of merging the surveys is to avoid the confusion and
to maximize the number of ALSes responding to the survey. 


At the capacity building WG, we decided to work on the survey for a week and
come up with a very short but efficient part that would be the CB section of
a global survey. Also, we can propose a draft of part 1.


Wolf, this is the CBWG proposal. I hope you will like. Your prompt reply is
very appreciated


Thank you Wolf for your understanding   





Executive Director

Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (FMAI)

Phone:  + 216 41 649 605

Mobile: + 216 98 330 114

Fax:       + 216 70 853 376








-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/private/capacity-building-wg/attachments/20130918/1aa32f8b/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the capacity-building-wg mailing list