[Capacity-Building-WG] Survey

Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro at gmail.com
Sat Sep 21 18:50:39 UTC 2013

Dear Tijani,

For the many reasons shared in Durban, I feel that the Survey should not be merged. The Capacity Building Survey is for the long term capacity building of the At Large and not limited to the Summit. Secondly, the people attending the Summit are just one or two people from the ALS. 

However, the type of feedback and respondents of the capacity building survey are not just ALSes but also more importantly, the view of those (individuals) within ALSes that participate in the At Large or ICANN processes.

There has been work done for months in cleaning up up the data in relation to the ALS as far as contact details are concerned which is the responsibility of the RALO Secretariat and the ALS to constantly update. There has been in the past inconsistent recording by Staff but this was picked up by the working group in the cleaning up process and highlighted to staff. 

The Capacity Building Survey has a specific objective and merging the ATLAS Survey will not help us fulfill our quest if we reduce our questions to cater for the ATLAS. 

Kind Regards,

Sent from my iPad

On Sep 22, 2013, at 12:15 AM, "Tijani BENJEMAA" <tijani.benjemaa at topnet.tn> wrote:

> Dear all,
> I proposed to Wolf to merge the ATLAS II and the Capacity Building surveys for the following reasons:
> ·        Both surveys are urgent since both are needed for the Summit II
> ·        If not merged, they will be distributed in the same period, which will produce a confusion and may lead to inconsistent answers or very few ALSes responding
> ·        The only disadvantage of merging them is that it will result in a very long survey that may discourage the ALSes to go through it.
> ·        The proposal is to conceive a survey of 3 parts:
> o   Section 1: ALS Details
> o   Section 2: Part dedicated to ATLAS II WG
> o   Section 3: Part dedicated to Capacity Building WG
> ·        Section 1 will be very short to provide up to date contacts and languages used
> ·        Section 2 will be finalized by the ATLAS II survey sub-group
> ·        Section 3 will be a very short part for Capacity Building
> To make things practical, I’m proposing in the attached file:
> ·        What the CB WG thinks it could be section 1
> ·        Section 3 as shortened by a small team in the CB WG (Dev, Carlos and myself).
> I want to remind you that for the ATLAS II summit, the ALSes need to be prepared for an effective and efficient participation, and the CBWG is in charge of such preparation. That’s why the CBWG needs this section of the survey.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Tijani BEN JEMAA
> Executive Director
> Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (FMAI)
> Phone:  + 216 41 649 605
> Mobile: + 216 98 330 114
> Fax:       + 216 70 853 376
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> <Survey_CB section_Draft.docx>
> _______________________________________________
> capacity-building-wg mailing list
> capacity-building-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/capacity-building-wg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/private/capacity-building-wg/attachments/20130922/caa5f0d8/attachment.html>

More information about the capacity-building-wg mailing list