[Capacity-Building-WG] Pre-ATLAS II Capacity Building Programme
Ali AlMeshal
dralialmeshal at gmail.com
Thu Apr 17 22:05:56 UTC 2014
Good day to all,
I fully agree with Maureen.
Tijani, the evaluation sheet as i can see is very basic and simple and we
should not go beyond this to make it easy for all parties , presenter and
attendees as well as reviewer.
regards
On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Tijani BEN JEMAA <tijani.benjemaa at planet.tn
> wrote:
> Maureen,
>
>
>
> I fully agree with you, and it will be better to make them specific; my
> only problem is that I have to ask the trainers to establish those sheets,
> and at this late moments, I really hesitate to ask them.
>
>
>
> But we may ask about how the trainees feel: understand well the content?
> If not, what are the parts that they don’t understand? This may give us
> almost the same result without asking the trainers for more efforts (they
> are volunteers as well).
>
>
>
> The other WG members: please comment
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *Tijani BEN JEMAA*
>
> Executive Director
>
> Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (*FMAI*)
>
> Phone: + 216 41 649 605
>
> Mobile: + 216 98 330 114
>
> Fax: + 216 70 853 376
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *De :* Maureen Hilyard [mailto:hilyard at oyster.net.ck]
> *Envoyé :* jeudi 17 avril 2014 11:55
> *À :* tijani.benjemaa at planet.tn; 'Tijani BEN JEMAA'
> *Cc :* capacity-building-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> *Objet :* RE: [Capacity-Building-WG] Pre-ATLAS II Capacity Building
> Programme
>
>
>
> Hi Tijani
>
>
>
> ALSes should make an effort to attend so we could certainly change the
> final sentence to “You are expected to attend these sessions. The
> evaluation will provide us with valuable feedback.”
>
>
>
> As for a generic evaluation – what would that assess? Each session is
> different so that the learning outcomes are also different. Perhaps the
> presenters could establish 3-4 learning outcomes to check whether these
> have been achieved after their session. This would give a true indication
> of whether the CB programme was in fact effective and useful. Perhaps it’s
> my teaching background coming out. J
>
>
>
> Maureen
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Tijani BEN JEMAA [mailto:tijani.benjemaa at planet.tn]
> *Sent:* Thursday, 17 April 2014 12:39 a.m.
> *To:* 'Maureen Hilyard'; 'Tijani BEN JEMAA'
> *Cc:* capacity-building-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> *Subject:* RE: [Capacity-Building-WG] Pre-ATLAS II Capacity Building
> Programme
>
>
>
> Thank you very much Maureen.
>
>
>
> My comments:
>
> · It’s perhaps better to avoid saying that the evaluation sheet
> will record “your attendance” since people will see it as a watch dog to
> track them and generally, they react negatively to such things.
>
> · The evaluation sheet you are proposing is specific to each
> topic. I was thinking of a generic one.
>
> All the other things are ok with me.
>
>
>
> All members of the WG: please give your opinion before we finalize the
> sheet.
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> *Tijani BEN JEMAA*
>
> Executive Director
>
> Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (*FMAI*)
>
> Phone: + 216 41 649 605
>
> Mobile: + 216 98 330 114
>
> Fax: + 216 70 853 376
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *De :* capacity-building-wg-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:
> capacity-building-wg-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] *De la part de*Maureen Hilyard
> *Envoyé :* mercredi 16 avril 2014 22:13
> *À :* Tijani BEN JEMAA
> *Cc :* capacity-building-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> *Objet :* [Capacity-Building-WG] Pre-ATLAS II Capacity Building Programme
>
>
>
> Hi Tijani,
>
>
>
> If we want people to come to these sessions regularly, they must first
> learn something from them and there should not be any onerous evaluation
> after them.
>
>
>
> Based on the information that Dev has sent to us about the COMMUNICATION
> session, the evaluation draft I have prepared should firstly just tell us
> if we achieved OUR objectives or not, and how else we might be able to
> assist ALSes to better understand the topic that has been introduced for
> later sessions. As the initial evaluation, we also need to know that the
> technology is working for them too, otherwise they won’t be able to attend
> anyway. My recommendation is to send a brief link to a monkey survey with
> the invitation, that participants can return after the session, consisting
> of the following.
>
>
>
> *(To be included into the invitation?)*
>
> ALSes are an important part of the At Large consultation process. Your
> participation in policy development sessions contributes to decision-making
> within At Large and ICANN overall. This session is part of a programme of
> topics which aims to provide some background before the ATLAS II meeting in
> London. You are expected to attend these sessions and the evaluation form
> will record your attendance as well as provide us with valuable feedback.
>
>
>
> *(Evaluation form)*
>
> To: (Name)
>
> Regional Group (RALO):
>
> Email address:
>
>
>
> Thank you for participating in our *Pre-ATLAS II Capacity Building*session on
> *COMMUNICATION*
>
>
>
> *Please indicate your responses to the following questions**. (provide
> buttons to click)*
>
>
>
> I was able to hear and understand the speakers during the
> session
> Yes No
>
> I had no difficulty with the technology (Adobe Connect or phone
> connectivity) Yes
> No
>
>
>
> I now understand:
>
> 1. The communication network within At Large (ALSes, RALOs, At Large
> Staff, the ALAC) Yes No
>
> 2. How to communicate with the At Large community (mailing list,
> Skype, wiki, others?) Yes No
>
> 3. Where to find information about At Large meetings (emails, At
> Large calendar) Yes No
>
> 4. How to connect to and participate in an At Large meeting (Adobe,
> phone bridge, Skype) Yes No
>
>
>
> Any comments to help us with further capacity building training in this
> area?
>
> *(provide a comments box– limit 50 words)*
>
>
>
> *SUBMIT **(to At Large staff)*
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> [image: Image removed by sender.] <http://www.avast.com/>
>
> Ce courrier électronique ne contient aucun virus ou logiciel malveillant
> parce que la protection Antivirus avast! <http://www.avast.com/> est
> active.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> <http://www.avast.com/>
>
> Ce courrier électronique ne contient aucun virus ou logiciel malveillant
> parce que la protection Antivirus avast! <http://www.avast.com/> est
> active.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> capacity-building-wg mailing list
> capacity-building-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/capacity-building-wg
>
>
--
Thanks
Ali AlMeshal
Bahrain Internet Society - BIS
Board Member & Director of Strategic Alliances
Professional Public speaker in ICT and e-Business
Payment Industry Expert Advisor
Mobile: +973 39440025
Skype: alialmeshal
email: dralialmeshal at gmail.com
ali.almeshal at bis.org.bh
www.bis.org.bh
Twitter :@internetBH
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/private/capacity-building-wg/attachments/20140418/5470d4ae/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 823 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/private/capacity-building-wg/attachments/20140418/5470d4ae/image001-0001.jpg>
More information about the capacity-building-wg
mailing list