[Capacity-Building-WG] Policy writing/ public comment course

Alfredo Calderon calderon.alfredo at gmail.com
Sun Apr 5 13:22:32 UTC 2020

Dear Maureen:

Many thanks for this. Actually, when I took the course those were precisely
my conrm=cerns. I believe that the proposal @Glenn McKnight
<mcknight.glenn at gmail.com> proposed last FY was seeking that goal. But, for
some reason, the message did not seem to get across.

@Joanna <joannakulesza at gmail.com> this can be another course that can be
developed under the "Policy Platform Concept".

Hope everyone is safe and well.

Kind Regards,

[image: photo]
*Alfredo Calderon*
eLearning Consultant

calderon.alfredo at gmail.com

http://aprendizajedistancia.blogspot.com | Skype: Alfredo_1212
| wiseintro.co/alfredocalderon
<http://pr.linkedin.com/in/acalderon52> <http://twitter.com/acalderon52>
<http://www.pinterest.com/acalderon/> <http://www.slideshare.net/acalderon>
<http://klout.com/#/acalderon52> <http://wiseintro.co/alfredocalderon>

IMPORTANT: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential.
They are intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you have received
this email by mistake, please notify the sender immediately and do not
disclose the contents to anyone or make copies thereof.
Get your own email signature

[image: Mailtrack]
notified by
09:18:46 AM

On Sun, Apr 5, 2020 at 1:47 AM Maureen Hilyard <maureen.hilyard at gmail.com>

> Dear Team
> Has anyone looked at the current ICANN Learn Policy writing course which
> was developed by NCUC? It definitely highlighted an approach that was quite
> different from our own. I was quite disappointed because I don't think that
> it is useful in addressing the more inclusive fact-gathering, consensus
> model of developing a statement that we use in At-Large and particularly by
> the CPWG.  This process would be appropriate for a policy or a non-policy
> issue.
> But there was a good section that explained the purpose of the Public
> Comment.
> From an At-Large point of view, I wondered if our CB team could ensure
> that an At-Large "public comment" course might focus more on the
> methodology that is used by the CPWG where much time is spent on:
> * participants from across the array of backgrounds within At-Large
> offering their views after analysing the purpose of the request and the
> resource material around the topic to sort out how a particular policy is
> relevant to our section of ICANN - end-users
> * herding the discussions in a way that gathers information while at the
> same time tries to balance the various end-user perspectives into a
> cohesive argument - this is an important task requiring some major skills,
> for example:
> 1) great moderation skills which are demonstrated well by Jonathan and
> Olivier  esp keeping participant contributions focused, relevant and
> non-repetitive
> 2) seeking views from within the group from people who have the
> appropriate level of knowledge and can articulate their views in such a way
> that others can support or add further perspectives which might capture a
> more directed approach to a statement that fits the enduser point of view
> 3)  From among the many articulated views which have been captured by an
> initial penholder or penholders, a small group may start moulding the
> various perspectives  into a logical argument that will form the basis of a
> consensus end-user viewpoint
> 4) The draft statement is then presented to the CPWG for further
> discussion and fine-tuning, to create a final statement. Several iterations
> of this process may be required before the statement is complete.
> * While developing the course it might be appropriate to offer some
> examples of what each stage might entail, during the process of information
> gathering, putting it into a presentation (or a series of presentations) to
> collate all the different ideas and perspectives, then finalising the
> statement. .
> 5) One constraint on this process is the restrictive timeframe given by
> the requestors with regards to the time allowed for this important
> discussion, especially if it is of greater importance to the end-user
> community. This has required single topic sessions on top of the already
> assigned weekly sessions. This is a big commitment for volunteers.
> 6) ICANN staff complete the statement document in preparation for its
> delivery to the requestors of the comments, before ratification by the ALAC.
> M
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/capacity-building-wg/attachments/20200405/81984a72/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the capacity-building-wg mailing list