[Ccpdp-rm] On RFC1591 and "binding"
Dr Eberhard W Lisse
el at lisse.NA
Wed Apr 21 21:28:26 UTC 2021
I have put this also in the chat.
I am not hung up on why we discuss binding. So while we do it because
of scripture we can extend it on its merits.
el
On 2021-04-21 23:14 , Patricio Poblete wrote:
> Eberhard,
>
> The FoI did not speak of a review in the context of Delegations, which
> is where the RFC1591 mentions the IDNB. It does mention the right of
> appeal in the context of revocation.
>
> Why does it matter to me? Because I think that the binding or not
> binding nature of a review should be discussed on its own merits, not
> because some old piece of scripture that was never implemented said so.
> I think that we will make a stronger case that way.
>
> Patricio
[...]
--
Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse \ / Obstetrician & Gynaecologist
el at lisse.NA / * | Telephone: +264 81 124 6733 (cell)
PO Box 8421 Bachbrecht \ / If this email is signed with GPG/PGP
10007, Namibia ;____/ Sect 20 of Act No. 4 of 2019 may apply
More information about the Ccpdp-rm
mailing list