<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class="">I also have to agree with Dr E’s comments.<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">While the language may be an attempt for clarity, looking up SIP it means anyone that “may” be impacted. Its inclusion, I suspect, would open the door for some type of extra-territorial overreach. </div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">With regard to Patricio’s further comment, perhaps reworded thusly, though still kind of awkward;</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><blockquote style="margin: 0 0 0 40px; border: none; padding: 0px;" class=""><div class=""><i class="">Due process, with due notices, opportunity to be heard, be aware a matter is pending and make an informed decision to choose whether to contest and assert before the appropriate body. </i></div></blockquote><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Sean</div><div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Aug 4, 2021, at 01:29, Bart Boswinkel via Ccpdp-rm <<a href="mailto:ccpdp-rm@icann.org" class="">ccpdp-rm@icann.org</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><span id="cid:EAC1BBCEC5A1B64088B4C699889BF190@pexch112.icann.org"><ccPDP3-Rev Overall Principles Review mechanism v3 clean.pdf></span></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></body></html>