[CCT-Review] The path ahead
JZuck at actonline.org
Wed Feb 8 11:27:31 UTC 2017
We will be spending our two next plenary calls(February 9 & 15) discussing the Executive Summary, defining Prioritization and finally reviewing recommendations priority (including if there is a prerequisite to subsequent procedures). Considering we are behind schedule on our papers discussions, we have shifted our deadline to publish our draft recommendations to February 20. Therefore, I would like you use this limited extra time to review and comment the below papers before Friday February 10, after this date no further comments will be accepted on these papers.
a. Impact of Safeguards<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_WUXtXXNN-5djv48IPqy_MIi_SQ1tKIXluN0vpTmh6A/edit?usp=sharing> – Laureen
b. Benefits vs. Confusion to End Users<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1SRQdIC5Sp1VYC0Aji8Ny4KySq97OYRt3UYsmFQT-ltg/edit?usp=sharing> – Megan
c. Registry Policies<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JyNtL4IKD5Cyv65gqQwgfsFyOWPigPqY2NRILpu-2h4/edit?usp=sharing> – Megan
d. Preventing Delegations that would be confusing or harmful<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1g4TEPm_bDy_2kajJLj6iuQRvMQXiCJrwS7siHroSuJI/edit?usp=sharing> – Megan
e. Allowing specific communities to be served by a relevant TLD<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OIrOsW49_AFDQwGBiYsQ5FdwWVSWQvWoIWEXFqSaYVE/edit?usp=sharing> – Megan
f. Effectiveness of the Dispute Resolution Process in cases of Formal String Objection<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Wi-DDM3vFm4lhIkyKBPoiAVhLtURRsfBigNPozPxKSs/edit?usp=sharing> – Megan
g. Simplifying the process<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1xsa3xLtLIUBywp8TZjhcD0BFP14r4wzaQe67XNxbDyY/edit?usp=sharing> – Megan
All other documents are accessible via the google master doc<https://docs.google.com/document/d/15hRffuM8y1Qpl663H4R7fzH9T9WWVQbrWC3SC-zT-xs/edit?usp=sharing>.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the CCT-Review