[Ccwg-auctionproceeds] For your review - updated response to the ICANN Board
Judith Hellerstein
judith at jhellerstein.com
Thu Apr 20 13:14:35 UTC 2017
Hi all,
I like Elliot and Erica's wording better, but not opposed to Daniel 's additions
Best
Judith
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 20, 2017, at 7:36 AM, elliot noss <enoss at tucows.com> wrote:
>
> I would not be opposed to the addition of:
>
> "detrimental to the potential benefits the funding could provide to the Internet vs. to ICANN”
>
> but I did want to stick what was, not what the implication would be. I prefer them to draw their own conclusions. thanks.
>
> EN
>
>> On Apr 20, 2017, at 7:23 AM, Marc Gauw <marc.gauw at nlnet.nl> wrote:
>>
>> +1 ..... perfectly phrased
>>
>> Op 20-4-2017 om 13:13 schreef Daniel Dardailler:
>>> On 2017-04-19 22:00, Erika Mann wrote:
>>>> Elliot - I like this recommendation but let's hear what others are
>>>> saying.
>>>
>>> +1 to raising this issue explicitly.
>>>
>>> I'd go even further and say that the desire to cast a wide net is
>>> ICANN's desire in the first place.
>>>
>>> Also, I think attorn is too strong/legally charged a word, and would
>>> use acknowledge instead.
>>>
>>> I would also explain why this limit is an issue.
>>>
>>> That would give this paragraph:
>>>
>>> "We note that despite ICANN and the CCWG's desire to cast a wide
>>> net, this may be constrained by a narrow interpretation of congruence
>>> with ICANN’s mission. We appreciate the legal and other implications
>>> of aiignment with the mission and we acknowledge them, but we also
>>> note that this necessarily limits the size of the net and therefore
>>> could be detrimental to the potential benefits the funding could
>>> provide to the Internet vs. to ICANN."
>>>
>>>
>>> Also, there is a typo in "Organzation"
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> @Marika, thank you for the work, will review it asap.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Erika
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 9:38 PM, elliot noss <enoss at tucows.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Marika,
>>>>>
>>>>> There is one concept that I think would be important to communicate.
>>>>> I would suggest it as an addendum to the comment dealing with a
>>>>> “wide net”. Something like:
>>>>>
>>>>> * “We note that despite our desire to cast a wide net, this is
>>>>> constrained by a narrow interpretation of congruence with ICANN’s
>>>>> mission. We appreciate the legal and other implications of
>>>>> congruence with mission and expect to attorn to them, but we also
>>>>> note that this necessarily limits the size of the net”.
>>>>>
>>>>> I add this because the board is, in my opinion, on both sides of
>>>>> this issue. The net can be cast as wide as possible only GIVEN
>>>>> congruence with mission. This trade off should be made explicit or
>>>>> the board will have their fig leaf and we will bear the criticism
>>>>> (board members on the list take note! :-)).
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> EN
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Apr 19, 2017, at 3:11 PM, Marika Konings
>>>>>> <marika.konings at icann.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear All,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Following our meeting last week, please find attached for your
>>>>>> review the updated response to the ICANN Board which aims to
>>>>>> address the comments raised during the call. Please share any
>>>>>> further comments and/or edits you may have with the list by
>>>>>> Wednesday 26 April at the latest.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Marika
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _MARIKA KONINGS_
>>>>>> _Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet
>>>>>> Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) _
>>>>>> _Email: marika.konings at icann.org _
>>>>>> _ _
>>>>>> _Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO_
>>>>>> _Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses
>>>>>> [1] and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages [2]. _
>>>>>> <CCWG AP - draft response to ICANN Board - updated 18 April
>>>>>> 2017.docx>_______________________________________________
>>>>>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
>>>>>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
>>>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds [3]
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
>>>>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
>>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds [3]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Links:
>>>> ------
>>>> [1] http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso
>>>> [2]
>>>> http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-efforts.htm#newcomers
>>>>
>>>> [3] https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
>>>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
>>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
>>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
>>
>>
>> --
>> Marc Gauw,
>> Directeur Stichting NLnet
>> + 31 6 24 874 224
>> + 31 20 888 4252
>> marc.gauw at nlnet.nl
>> Science Park 400
>> 1098 XH Amsterdam
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
> Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
More information about the Ccwg-auctionproceeds
mailing list