[Ccwg-auctionproceeds] For your review - updated version open internet definition / description

Vanda Scartezini vanda at scartezini.org
Sat Sep 2 21:46:35 UTC 2017

Yes, Daniel I agree with you. 
We need to stick with ICANN role and principies and  shall define what we mean,  not leave it for further interpretations.
Vanda Scartezini
Polo Consultores Associados
Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004
01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253
Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 
Sorry for any typos. 


On 9/2/17, 13:39, "ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces at icann.org on behalf of Daniel Dardailler" <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces at icann.org on behalf of danield at w3.org> wrote:

>Hello Marika, all
>Reading this document, I think I agree with Erika that we should 
>consider giving our collective view of what we, the CCWG, think 
>constitutes the Open Internet, and put it in a preamble to a section 
>introducing a more detailed and ICANN mission specific set of things 
>that adhere to the principles introduced in the preamble.
>The document as it stands contains both kind of definition/description 
>so it's difficult to agree with it as a whole, i.e. to summarize it in 
>one piece.
>I also think ISOC paper on exactly this topic,
>provides the right axis for defining our principles: technology, 
>economy, politics, society.
>One thing this paper also does is recognizing that what the technology 
>"can" do is different from what the user "may" do. The use of 
>"accessible to all people for all purposes" in the document seems to 
>ignore this fact.
>On 2017-08-31 22:44, Marika Konings wrote:
>> Dear All,
>> Hereby attached the updated version of the open internet definition /
>> description which incorporates the comments and suggestions that were
>> submitted since the last version. As there are a number of definitions
>> / descriptions that have been put forward so far, are there any
>> volunteers who would like to take a stab at coming up with a draft
>> that brings the different perspectives together and addresses the
>> different comments and contributions to date which the CCWG could
>> review during its next meeting?
>> Best regards,
>> Marika
>> _Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet
>> Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) _
>> _Email: marika.konings at icann.org  _
>> _ _
>> _Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO_
>> _Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses [1]
>> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages [2]. _
>> Links:
>> ------
>> [1] http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso
>> [2]
>> http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-efforts.htm#newcomers
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
>Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
>Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org

More information about the Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list