[Ccwg-auctionproceeds] Conflict Of Interest, was Fwd: Board reply to CCWG-AP

James Gannon james at cyberinvasion.net
Tue Sep 5 16:31:27 UTC 2017


Agreed, if at all possible I would suggest an independent opinion be procured by non-profit expert counsel on the impact of disbursing outside of mission. Adler and Colvin who were involved in setting up the new ICANN governance structures would be absolutely best placed to provide such outside counsel IMO (NO affiliation to Adler other than being impressed with their CA NFP experience during the CCWG)

-----Original Message-----
From: ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces at icann.org [mailto:ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of elliot noss
Sent: 05 September 2017 17:28
To: ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] Conflict Of Interest, was Fwd: Board reply to CCWG-AP

and I will add to this that I am not (at all) convinced that giving away money with a broader scope than the organizational mission would risk non-profit status in any way. ISOC, nominet cira and NLnet are all examples to the contrary.

I also respect and appreciate ICANN legal giving us their view on the matter AND they are deeply incented to take a narrow view of this question. I do not begrudge them that. BUT, we should be able to avail ourselves of independant opinion, particularly in dealing with $230m!

hopefully that is enough for mark to hold off on his resignation until this issue is determined, because it is relatively simply determinable.

EN

> On Sep 5, 2017, at 10:15 AM, Marc Gauw <marc.gauw at nlnet.nl> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> After reading the Board reply with respect to 'Conflict Of Interest', it is getting obvious that the Board does not encourage that ccWG-members would also nominate for receiving/dispersing auction-funds later-on.
>   
> I have to respect that, and therefor have decided to leave the ccWG per today.
> 
> Note that NLnet Foundation over the last 20 years has been very active in dispersing our own charity-fund to hundreds of Internet projects, the last years primarily on open source and cybersecurity. 
> 
> It was our intention to share our 'Internet-charity-experience' with this team DURING the ccWG, AND to provide support with dispersing parts of the auction-funds to the right non-profit cybersecurity projects AFTER the ccWG.
> 
> Now that it retrospectively turns out that the first support may exclude us from the second support, we have no choice than to leave the ccWG, since potentially receiving a (modest) part of the ICANN funds is crucial for our NLnet-battle against exponentially growing cybersecurity threats.
> 
> Many thanks for working together with you, and all the best with the remaining work in the ccWG !
> 
> Kind regards,
> Marc
> 
> 
> Op 4-9-2017 om 16:29 schreef Erika Mann:
>> Dear All - 
>> 
>> herewith I'm forwarding Steve's reply to our letter. 
>> 
>> We will have a first exchange on Thursday this week, during our CCWG AP call. I send Steve already a quick reply, saying that we will discuss the Board letter then for the first time. 
>> 
>> Best, 
>> Erika
>> 
>> 
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Steve Crocker <steve.crocker at board.icann.org>
>> Date: Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 3:19 PM
>> Subject: Board reply to CCWG-AP
>> To: Erika Mann <erika at erikamann.com>, Ching Chiao <chiao at brandma.co>, Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org>
>> Cc: Steve Crocker <steve.crocker at board.icann.org>, Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org>, Icann-board ICANN <icann-board at icann.org>, Avri Doria <avri at apc.org>, "Sarah B. Deutsch" <sarahbdeutsch at gmail.com>, Board Operations <Board-Ops-Team at icann.org>, Sally Costerton <sally.costerton at icann.org>, Samantha Eisner <Samantha.Eisner at icann.org>, Lauren Allison <lauren.allison at icann.org>
>> 
>> 
>> Dear Erika and Ching,
>>  
>> Thank you for your letter received on May 22, 2017 on behalf of the Cross Community Working Group on New gTLD Auction Proceeds (CCWG-AP) in response to the Board email of March 2nd 2017.
>>  
>> On behalf of the Board, I am delighted to see that we are aligned in our thinking regarding the points discussed in the original email. Specifically, in response to your letter, please find attached a letter including additional acknowledgements and requested clarifications.
>>  
>> Thank you again for your efforts leading this work. 
>>  
>> Steve
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
>> 
>> Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
> 
> 
> -- 
> Marc Gauw,
> Directeur Stichting NLnet
> + 31 6 24 874 224
> + 31 20 888 4252
> 
> marc.gauw at nlnet.nl
> 
> Science Park 400
> 1098 XH  Amsterdam
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
> Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds

_______________________________________________
Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds


More information about the Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list