[Ccwg-auctionproceeds] Conflict Of Interest, was Fwd: Board reply to CCWG-AP
vanda at scartezini.org
Tue Sep 5 21:47:09 UTC 2017
I guess you should Marc. Conflict of Interest is also some self committed to not make any proposal in self benefit. It is a question of Ethics and We bet on yours.
Polo Consultores Associados
Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004
01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253
Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464
Sorry for any typos.
From: <ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces at icann.org<mailto:ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces at icann.org>> on behalf of Marc Gauw <marc.gauw at nlnet.nl<mailto:marc.gauw at nlnet.nl>>
Date: Tuesday, September 5, 2017 at 18:36
To: "ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org<mailto:ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org>" <ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org<mailto:ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org>>
Subject: Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] Conflict Of Interest, was Fwd: Board reply to CCWG-AP
Ok, well, after all those warm words, l'll take the bet and continue :-)
Op 5 sep. 2017 om 19:28 heeft Evan Leibovitch <evan at telly.org<mailto:evan at telly.org>> het volgende geschreven:
I join those suggesting that Marc reconsider resigning.
This is ICANN, where there is effectively no such thing as conflict of interest so long as you declare. Were ICANN institutionally to have real concerns about CofI, many PDPs would be nearly barren of membership and the RAAs would look ... very different. As a minimum.
It is with the acceptance of this reality in mind that I pause to consider why the Board chooses this as the place to make a stand about “Was this decision taken without conflict of interest?”. That says more about the Board's attitude to this WG than the interests of our membership.
Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org<mailto:Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Ccwg-auctionproceeds