[Ccwg-auctionproceeds] For your review - updated version open internet definition / description

Erika Mann erika at erikamann.com
Wed Sep 6 09:20:52 UTC 2017


All - I hope to be able to send you tomorrow a new 'open Internet' preamble
draft text, based on suggestions you made. I had hoped to be able to do
this today but I have to finalize some other work first.

Until tomorrow!
Erika

On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 3:00 AM, Sylvia Cadena <sylvia at apnic.net> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
>
>
> I have checked the document that Marika shared with comments from many of
> us and incorporated the last ones made on this thread. I hope the attached
> document serves to structure a preamble (as Erika suggested) in a way that
> reflects the spirit of the CCWG discussions, and our intent for the auction
> proceeds funds to make a difference.
>
>
>
> Warm regards,
>
>
>
> Sylvia
>
>
>
> ————
>
>
>
> ** ISIF Asia call for grants proposals and award nominations has been
> extended until 15 September (midnight UTC) www.isif.asia - Get started
> and submit your application! **
>
>
>
> Sylvia Cadena | sylvia at apnic.net | APNIC Foundation - Head of Programs |
> +10 GMT Brisbane, Australia | http://www.apnic.foundation
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *<ccwg-auctionproceeds-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Judith
> Hellerstein <judith at jhellerstein.com>
> *Organization: *Hellerstein & Associates
> *Reply-To: *Judith Hellerstein <judith at jhellerstein.com>
> *Date: *Tuesday, 5 September 2017 at 2:17 pm
> *To: *"ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org" <ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [Ccwg-auctionproceeds] For your review - updated version
> open internet definition / description
>
>
>
> HI Erika and others,
>
> I like Daniel's summary of Open Internet but we need to also address the
> issue of accessibility. If you recall Elliott suggested the following
>
> An Internet that is equally accessible to all people for all purposes, and
> at every level of the stack. At the lower end of the stack, that means no
> impediments are placed based on the sender, recipient, content, application
> or type of  data being transmitted.
>
>
> If we could add the concept of accessibility to your definition I think
> that would greatly help
>
> I also like Sylvia Cadena's text and hope we can figure out a way to add
> this to our definition.
>
> That means no impediments are placed based on the sender, recipient,
> content, application or type of data being transmitted.
>
> That means policy and regulation promote, support, facilitate and
> guarantee access
>
> That means equality of access at a pragmatic level is ensured by assuring
> access at prices affordable to all members of society
>
> That means training is available about how to manage, operate and how to
> use the Internet, as well as education in how to use it effectively
>
> That means participation on an equal footing at all levels is encouraged,
> specially by those that might be discriminated against
>
>
> Best,
> Judith
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
>
> Judith Hellerstein, Founder & CEO
>
> Hellerstein & Associates
>
> 3001 Veazey Terrace NW, Washington DC 20008
>
> Phone: (202) 362-5139  Skype ID: judithhellerstein
>
> Mobile/Whats app: +1202-333-6517 <(202)%20333-6517>
>
> E-mail: Judith at jhellerstein.com   Website: www.jhellerstein.com
>
> Linked In: www.linkedin.com/in/jhellerstein/
>
> Opening Telecom & Technology Opportunities Worldwide
>
>
>
> On 9/4/2017 7:04 AM, Daniel Dardailler wrote:
>
> How about this for a start.
>
> ===
>
> The concept of “Open Internet”, as referred to in the CCWG objectives
> statement, can be described at many levels, e.g. technogical, business,
> political, etc, and in particular, at the societal level:
>
>   An Open Internet is one where all people are empowered to contribute and
> to participate in building a worldwide culture that opens our hearts and
> minds by respecting differences. It is an Internet (i.e. a network of
> networks) that we, the people of the world, recognize as ours  — something
> we have built together for one another
>
> At the technogical level, openness refers to how easily machines can
> connect to each others and how stable, scalable, and secure the network is.
> The IP routing and numbering systems, the DNS, or the Open Standard
> process, have historically been serving an Open Internet because of the
> opportunities they have provided to participate, innovate and compete
> without artificial impediments (e.g. patents, walled-garden).
>
> At the policy level, supporting the Open Internet happens when for
> instance governments put in place regulations that promote, support,
> facilitate and guarantee equal connectivity at prices affordable to all
> members of society, together with education and training efforts toward
> making the next generation more Internet savvy.
>
> In an ideal world, an Open Internet is one where no control or impediments
> are placed based on the sender, recipient, content, application or type of
> data being transmitted.
>
> From that broad description, the CCWG has considered the parts of the Open
> Internet that:
>   - are aligned with the overall ICANN's mission and core commitments
>   - are in need of funding for more development support
>   - are creating value-added for the Open Internet at large
>   - are consensual enough so that they do not endanger the ICANN community
>
> ...
> <and here we need to apply our CCWG "filter" regarding layering, shared
> value, political issues, etc>
>
>
>
> On 2017-08-31 22:44, Marika Konings wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> Hereby attached the updated version of the open internet definition /
> description which incorporates the comments and suggestions that were
> submitted since the last version. As there are a number of definitions
> / descriptions that have been put forward so far, are there any
> volunteers who would like to take a stab at coming up with a draft
> that brings the different perspectives together and addresses the
> different comments and contributions to date which the CCWG could
> review during its next meeting?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Marika
>
> _MARIKA KONINGS_
>
> _Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet
> Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) _
>
> _Email: marika.konings at icann.org  _
>
> _ _
>
> _Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO_
>
> _Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses [1]
> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages [2]. _
>
>
>
> Links:
> ------
> [1] http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso
> [2]
> http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/
> presentations/policy-efforts.htm#newcomers
> _______________________________________________
> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
> Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
> Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
> Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-auctionproceeds/attachments/20170906/94a3b961/attachment.html>


More information about the Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list