[Ccwg-auctionproceeds] For your review - Updated CCWG Proposed Final Report and proposed agenda for Wednesday's meeting
Mei Lin Fung
mlf at alum.mit.edu
Mon Nov 4 19:57:23 UTC 2019
Thank you everyone -Could I acknowledge what a great job has been done to
bring the report to this level and how much hard work it took by so many
people, some of whom were far more involved than others who were observers
(including myself). It is something to be proud of!
I am supportive of Judith's recommendations that we are consistent in the
language wherever possible when referring to things that are referenced in
different parts of the report.
With gratitude
Mei Lin Fung
mlf at alum.mit.edu
Co-founder People Centered Internet with Vint Cerf
Chair, IEEE Industry Connections Social Impact Measurement
IEEE moderator for WSIS 2019 High Level Panel
<https://www.itu.int/net4/wsis/forum/2019/Agenda/ViewSession/173> on
Enabling Environment
Finalist, GEAR Challenge <https://www.performance.gov/GEARcenter/> 2019
Shortlisted for Women of the Year, Silicon Valley, 2018 Information Age
<https://www.information-age.com/women-in-it-awards-silicon-valley-winners-123477032/#>
ePayments Coalition, Digital ASEAN, World Economic Forum
https://www.linkedin.com/in/meilinfung/
(e) mlfung at gmail.com <mlfiung at gmail.com>
(t) meilinfung
On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 7:08 PM Judith Hellerstein <judith at jhellerstein.com>
wrote:
> HI All,
>
> Thanks for the latest version of the report. It was very helpful. I
> wanted to flag a few key issues before Wednesday so that they can be
> incorporated and discussed at the meeting. 1) I notice in a number of
> places we used tables that were actually images, a picture and not an
> actual table. This is problematical since people with screen readers will
> not be able to read the image nor will people using google translate as it
> will show up as an image. I know it is more work but hoping we could
> actually create new tables with the same info in it so it can be accessible
> to all.
>
> 2) In section 4.1 we state--• An independent panel of experts will
> review the applications. but in later section where we talk about Charter
> Question 7 we state--. The Independent Panel’s responsibility is to review
> and evaluate project. Can we be consistent and use the same phrasing
> throughout. I prefer the line from Charter Question 7 "The Independent
> Panel’s responsibility is to review and evaluate project"
>
> 3) 4.5-When we talk about the poll we took, I think it would be helpful to
> state the date that this occurred.
>
> 4) 5.2-- we state ● Disbursement of funds must be for projects that are
> in accordance with ICANN’s mission as set out in the bylaws, but in later ,
> Charter Question 6---we clarify this and state " The CCWG has identified
> three objectives for new gTLD Auction Proceeds fund allocation, one of
> which focuses on underserved populations:
>
> ● Benefit the development, distribution, evolution and
> structures/projects that support the Internet's unique identifier systems;
> ● Benefit capacity building and underserved populations, and;
> ● Benefit the open and interoperable Internet."
>
> Can we add a line in the first mention stating the wider definition of who
> is eligible for the funding-This is what we had worked on for the preamble
>
> This is what we had discussed and is what is in Charter Question 6 and
> also in the section in Annex C General Guidance--
>
> "Members and participants of the Cross Community Working Group Auction
> Proceeds (CCWG AP) believe nevertheless that it is important to put the
> broader Internet context into consideration. . . . In addition to being
> in service of ICANN’s mission, the auction proceeds from the new gTLD
> program shall be used to support projects that are consistent with an “open
> and interoperable Internet ”. The concept of “open and interoperable
> Internet” can be described from many angles: technological, business,
> political, social and cultural and may have different meanings in different
> communities. This Guidance for proposal review and Selection does not
> provide a definitive description, as the Internet continues to evolve at
> every level. "
>
> Best,
>
> Judith
>
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Judith Hellerstein, Founder & CEO
> Hellerstein & Associates
> 3001 Veazey Terrace NW, Washington DC 20008
> Phone: (202) 362-5139 Skype ID: judithhellerstein
> Mobile/Whats app: +1202-333-6517
> E-mail: Judith at jhellerstein.com Website: www.jhellerstein.com
> Linked In: www.linkedin.com/in/jhellerstein/
> Opening Telecom & Technology Opportunities Worldwide
>
>
> On 11/1/2019 5:46 PM, Marika Konings wrote:
>
> Dear CCWG,
>
>
>
> Please find attached an updated version of the proposed Final Report in
> which we’ve attempted to reflect the discussions from the last CCWG
> meeting. You will also find below the proposed agenda for Wednesday’s
> meeting. Please note that as a result of travel, the chairs have not had a
> chance to review the updated version of the proposed Final Report but to
> allow you as much time as possible to review this updated version, they
> agreed to go ahead and circulate it now. You are encouraged to flag any
> issues or concerns with this latest version prior to Wednesday’s meeting.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Marika
>
>
>
> ===========
>
>
>
> *Proposed Agenda – new gTLD Auction Proceeds Cross-Community Working Group*
>
> Wednesday 6 November from 17.00 – 18.30 UTC
>
>
>
> 1. Roll call
>
> 2. Welcome / DOI & SOI updates
>
> 3. Short recap of current status of work:
>
> a. Input received from ICANN Board & ICANN Org in relation to
> clarifying questions posed by CCWG (see
> https://community.icann.org/display/CWGONGAP/Additional+Questions+and+Responses
> )
>
> b. Survey not launched yet as input from ICANN Board, especially on
> mechanism C, was deemed essential to inform survey. Survey expected to be
> launched shortly after ICANN66 so that indicative consensus designations
> can be included in proposed Final Report.
>
> c. Staff & leadership team have proposed a number of updates to
> proposed Final Report in line with clarifications provided by ICANN Board &
> ICANN Org – those reviewed during the last and agreed to have been
> accepted. Changes as a result of last week’s meeting and those not reviewed
> yet can be seen in redline in the latest version. A couple of outstanding
> items remain for CCWG consideration.
>
> d. CCWG agreed during its meeting on 23 October to prepare launch of
> public comment on proposed Final Report shortly after ICANN66.
>
> 4. Outstanding issues:
>
> a. Page 24 – any concerns about the proposed modification in
> relation to programmatic adjustments and baskets?
>
> b. Page 26 – Consider Board input and decide whether updates should
> be made to this section.
>
> c. Page 27/28 – any concerns in relation to the updates made to
> change OEC to ‘through a committee if appropriate’ following Board input?
>
> d. Page 28 – consider Board input on topic of compensation and
> decide whether any updates should be made to this paragraph.
>
> e. Page 39 – any concerns in relation to the proposed modification
> to point 5 in line with the Board’s input?
>
> f. Any other issues?
>
> 5. Confirm next steps:
>
> 1. Launch of survey –timing?
>
> 2. Launch of public comment period – approach & timing?
>
> 3. Communication to Chartering Organizations
>
> 4. Inclusion of Minority view points in Final Report
>
> 5. Confirm action items / immediate next steps
>
> 6. AOB
>
>
>
> *Marika Konings*
>
> *Vice President, Policy Development Support – GNSO, Internet Corporation
> for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) *
>
> *Email: marika.konings at icann.org <marika.konings at icann.org> *
>
>
>
> *Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO*
>
> *Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__learn.icann.org_courses_gnso&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=5DXgId95wrCsHi--pxTiJD7bMB9r-T5ytCn7od3CF2Q&s=Cg5uQf0yAfw-qlFZ0WNBfsLmmtBNUiH0SuI6Vg-gXBQ&e=> and
> visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gnso.icann.org_files_gnso_presentations_policy-2Defforts.htm-23newcomers&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=7_PQAir-9nJQ2uB2cWiTDDDo5Hfy5HL9rSTe65iXLVM&m=5DXgId95wrCsHi--pxTiJD7bMB9r-T5ytCn7od3CF2Q&s=tT-E2RoAucUb3pfL9zmlbRdq1sytaEf765KOEkBVCjk&e=>. *
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing listCcwg-auctionproceeds at icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
> Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-auctionproceeds/attachments/20191104/f8aa688b/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Ccwg-auctionproceeds
mailing list