[Ccwg-auctionproceeds] REMINDER - Deadline Thursday, 28 May - minority statements

[Maureen Hilyard]

Hi Emily

The more that I see the statement of "small minority", the more I cannot
agree with the "small" being included there.
If you are still asking, my vote goes to removing  "small" from the
consensus definition so that it reads "a position where a minority
disagrees, but a majority agree"

Maureen

On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 11:27 PM Emily Barabas <emily.barabas at icann.org>
wrote:

> Dear all,
>
>
>
> As a reminder, if you would like to submit minority viewpoints (details
> below), the deadline to do so is this *Thursday, 28 May at **23:59 UTC**.*
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Emily
>
>
>
> *From: *Erika Mann <erika at erikamann.com>
> *Date: *Thursday, 7 May 2020 at 15:42
> *To: *Ccwg-auctionproceeds <ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org>
> *Cc: *Ching Chiao <ching.chiao at gmail.com>, Emily Barabas <
> emily.barabas at icann.org>, Marika Konings <marika.konings at icann.org>, Joke
> Braeken <joke.braeken at icann.org>
> *Subject: *[Ext] Fwd: Message for Erika to send to CCWG today [Subject:
> CCWG Auction Proceeds Consensus Call - Deadline 21 May 2020]
>
>
>
>
>
> Dear all,
>
>
>
> Thank you to those who participated in the final poll on mechanisms.
> Please find attached the Final Report reflecting results of the poll (see
> poll results in excel format here
> <https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/126432332/CCWG%20Auction%20Proceeds%20-%20Final%20Survey%20on%20Mechanisms%20-%20Summary.xlsx?version=1&modificationDate=1588328283000&api=v2>).
> With 15 members and 4 participants responding, poll results indicate strong
> support for mechanism A, followed by mechanism B with the majority of
> members supporting that the CCWG should recommend two mechanisms. Section
> 4.7 of the Report and Recommendation #1 have been updated to reflect this
> result.
>
>
>
> Seeing that there were no additional comments on the last revision
> circulated, the leadership team now considers the Final Report complete.
> The next step in the process is for the Co-Chairs to make a designation of
> the level of consensus for the recommendations in the report (see charter
> <https://community.icann.org/display/CWGONGAP/CCWG+Charter> for details,
> an excerpt of which is included below). *We believe that the CCWG
> supports the recommendations in this report by Consensus. Consensus is
> defined as “a position where a small minority disagrees, but most agree.”
> If you are a member of the CCWG and you disagree with this designation,
> please respond to the email list no later than **21 May at 23:59 UTC (14
> days from today).*
>
>
>
> *Please note that at this stage, we are not revisiting the substance of
> the recommendations or asking you to state your positions on specific
> recommendations. We are requesting a response only if you believe that the
> consensus designation is incorrect. If you would like to submit a minority
> viewpoint on the content of the recommendations, **you may do so, but
> this is separate from the consensus call. Minority statements will be due
> 28 May at 23:59 UTC (**21 days from today). **Minority statements may be
> included in an annex **to the Final Report or linked from **the Final
> Report to the wiki, depending on the length and number of statements
> received**.*
>
>
>
> Please also find attached a draft cover letter to send to the Chartering
> Organizations with the Final Report. *If you have questions or comments
> on this draft letter, please send to the* *email list no later than **21
> May at 23:59 UTC (14 days from today).*
>
>
>
> We hope you are all well, take good care and,
>
> kind regards,
>
>
>
> Erika and Ching
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Excerpt from the CCWG Charter regarding Consensus Designation:*
>
>
>
> *In developing its output, work plan and any other reports, the CCWG shall
> seek to act by consensus. The chair(s) may make a call for Consensus. If
> making such a call they should always make reasonable efforts to involve
> all Chartering Organization appointed Members of the CCWG (or sub-teams, if
> applicable). The chair(s) shall be responsible for designating each
> position as having one of the following designations:*
>
>
>
> *a)* *       Full Consensus - a position where no minority disagrees;
> identified by an absence of objection*
>
> *b)* *       Consensus – a position where a small minority disagrees, but
> most agree*
>
>
>
> *In the absence of Full Consensus, the chair(s) should allow for the
> submission of minority viewpoint(s) by the Chartering Organization
> appointed members and these, along with the consensus view, shall be
> included in the report.*
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ccwg-auctionproceeds mailing list
> Ccwg-auctionproceeds at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-auctionproceeds
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your
> personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance
> with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and
> the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can
> visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or
> configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or
> disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-auctionproceeds/attachments/20200524/df563ed9/attachment-0001.html>