[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] TLD Domain Pricing Amendment Act

Ryan ryan.weijian at gmail.com
Tue Feb 11 02:33:32 UTC 2020


To Whom It May Concern, 

The act would be clearer ONLY If there is clarity in justifiable reasons and basis to why there would be a DRASTIC spike in increase of domain fees for dot com domains only.

In business, whenever there’s price increase, the rise should be minimum and spread across all types of domains to minimise the effect and NOT heavily imposed on just one area of product only. 

Does the increase in prices offers any additional value to us end users or consumers to justify the price increase? Unreasonable unrealistic inflation if not hyper inflation of price is not acceptable. 

If something have to increase, VeriSign should instead Look at Premium Domains and charge Tax (tariffs like) charges on such premium domains for them unreasonable domain hoarding action and profit tiering when they simply purchase the domain at the original Low-entry price. 

Why should average users like us trying to make something work in online be punished for doing nothing wrong? 

Dot com domain hoarders (domain premium resellers are those whom should be reeled in). Their hoarding activity restricts productive businesses from buying their own domains. 

Do the right thing, domain hoarding are the black sheep, might as well Tax or get benefits from those high prices instead. Don’t look at entry dot com domains, look at Premium reseller dot com domains and the Bulk Premium Resellers instead. There’s more money to be made there since they already clearly jack up the price so high, VeriSign can kill two birds with one stone (1 single action).

#1: Bring justice to end users trying to buy our own domains
#2: VeriSign can increase profits without affecting be public (only those unprofessional overlooked Premium Domain Resellers).

I hope you like the suggestion. 
Thank you.
Ryan


More information about the Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20 mailing list