[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] .COM price increase

[Wayne Sankarlal]

 Yet again backroom deals are constraining the internet and its original
vision.

This from your own website - "It (ICANN) promotes competition and develops
policy on the Internet's unique identifiers. Through its coordination role
of the Internet's naming system, it does have an important impact on the
expansion and evolution of the Internet."

How then does a secret deal with a single entity like Verisign which is for
profit while you are non-profit in any promote competition. If Verisign
doesn't want the .com TLD they can sell it not use it like a cash cow with
ICANN's explicit and implicit agreement.

If you continue on this path, be honest and change your raison d'etre.  I'd
suggest, "Open to the highest bidder".

_______________________________________________
*Wayne Sankarlal , MBA, MS/CIS*
*Website Design & Development - Facebook Marketing*
*(416) 779-2231 | wsankarlal at gmail.com <wsankarlal at gmail.com>*


[image: Mailtrack]
<https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality5&>
Sender
notified by
Mailtrack
<https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality5&>
02/10/20,
04:58:19 PM
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20/attachments/20200210/8e0d9781/attachment.html>