[Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20] Proposed amendment 3 to the .com registry agreement
Jack Yan
jack.yan at jyanet.com
Thu Feb 13 10:20:35 UTC 2020
Ladies and Gentlemen:
The price rises proposed in this amendment are
deeply troubling. The internet was, when it was
founded, a democratic medium, one where a small
business with a great idea could shine as much as
a big business could. Look at the companies that
rose in that early era, such as Googlecompanies
that started with low cost, including securing a
dot-com domain name. The internet of the '90s was
for the many, not the few, and this great
equalizing effect produced innovation. Small- to
medium-sized businesses no longer needed massive
budgets to reach potential audiences.
Part of this democratization is the ability
for anyone to afford a domain name, to compete on
a level playing field with larger, better financed organizations.
Raising costs to a prohibitive level for some
will harm innovation: for one, people will not be
able to have the legitimacy that a unique domain
name would give them. It would affect their
efforts to give their creations a unique brand
name that will help them market their ideas. It
would also give an advantage to better-financed
citizens, which to me flies in the face of the raison d'être of the medium.
The United States is already being harmed
immeasurably by its change in philosophy over
monopolies: once considered harmful to
innovation, giving rise to your antitrust
legislation, they are now being tolerated in
certain casesone only needs to look online to
see where this has got us. Internet giants
dominating the landscape, making it far more
difficult for competitors to stand out. And
competition, I thought, was helpful to a country
that so believes in a market economy. The fact
that Google, Facebook and others offer "free
stuff" is deceptive: people might not be parting
with cash, but they are parting with their
identity. My point is that there are already
forces that work against individuals and small-
to medium-sized enterprises, and ICANN is putting
up one more if these substantial price increases go ahead.
Raising domain name prices, especially in the
dot-com space, therefore, stifles the economy in
numerous ways. In my opinion, the negatives
outweigh the positives, and I urge you to keep
the dot-com TLD accessible to all individuals.
Yours very truly,
Jack Yan
Jack Yan, LL B, BCA (Hons.), MCA
CEO, Jack Yan & Associates <http://jya.net>
Publisher, Lucire <http://lucire.com> and Autocade <http://autocade.net>
Co-chair, Medinge Group <http://medinge.org>
----------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20/attachments/20200213/29982764/attachment.html>
More information about the Comments-com-amendment-3-03jan20
mailing list