From beth at pir.org Mon Mar 22 15:15:18 2021 From: beth at pir.org (Elizabeth Bacon) Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 15:15:18 +0000 Subject: [Comments-iana-naming-function-contract-amend-10feb21] RySG Comments on the IANA Naming Function Review: Recommendation for an IANA Naming Function Contract Amendment Message-ID: <9DDDBA74-559C-499D-AF7E-AD0A2439C192@pir.org> Hello, On behalf of the gTLD Registries Stakeholder Group (RySG), please find attached our comments on the IANA Naming Function Review: Recommendation for an IANA Naming Function Contract Amendment. In the interest of time, we did not conduct a vote on these comments. We did discuss them on our mailing list and during a biweekly conference call, and no member opposed their submission. Please feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns. Best, Elizabeth Bacon Elizabeth Bacon | RySG Vice Chair, Policy -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: RySG_comment_Recommendation_for_an_IANA_Naming_Function_Contract_Amendment_(March-2021).pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 706506 bytes Desc: RySG_comment_Recommendation_for_an_IANA_Naming_Function_Contract_Amendment_(March-2021).pdf URL: From staff at atlarge.icann.org Mon Mar 22 17:12:58 2021 From: staff at atlarge.icann.org (ICANN At-Large Staff) Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 17:12:58 +0000 Subject: [Comments-iana-naming-function-contract-amend-10feb21] Ratified: ALAC Statement on IANA Naming Function Review: Recommendation for an IANA Naming Function Contract Amendment Message-ID: <4E401422-0F8D-4C43-9295-24E86944D28E@contoso.com> Dear All, Please find attached the ALAC Statement on IANA Naming Function Review: Recommendation for an IANA Naming Function Contract Amendment. ALAC ratification information is included on the cover page. Kind Regards, ICANN Policy Staff in support of the At-Large Community Website: atlarge.icann.org Facebook: facebook.com/icannatlarge Twitter: @ICANNAtLarge -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: AL-ALAC-ST-0321-01-00-EN (1).pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 85163 bytes Desc: AL-ALAC-ST-0321-01-00-EN (1).pdf URL: From sdelbianco at netchoice.org Tue Mar 23 15:39:07 2021 From: sdelbianco at netchoice.org (Steve DelBianco) Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 15:39:07 +0000 Subject: [Comments-iana-naming-function-contract-amend-10feb21] Business Constituency (BC) support for proposed amendment to IANA Naming Function Contract Message-ID: The ICANN Business Constituency (BC) supports the proposed amendment to the IANA Naming Function Contract: Article VII, Section 7.1 (a): This statement, "The relevant policies under which the changes are made shall be noted within each monthly report," be removed from the contract as it is a legacy statement from the NTIA contract that is no longer required. Implementation of this requirement has long been recognized as being operationally impracticable ever since the time of the NTIA contract, and the IFRT is satisfied that its continued inclusion in the contract adds no value to the reports. This comment was approved in accord with our charter. -- Steve DelBianco Vice Chair for Policy Coordination ICANN Business Constituency (BC) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: BC support for amendment to IANA Naming Function Contract.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 45074 bytes Desc: BC support for amendment to IANA Naming Function Contract.pdf URL: